Sunday, December 20, 2015

D & R - ugly labels

Those guys misinterpret the Islam and you guys misinterpret the Constitution of United States.

It's time, you take a fresh look at the Constitution of United States.

The Constitution divides the federal government into three branches. It is misinterpreted as a hierarchical structure.

  1. Executive
  2. Legislative 
  3. Judicial
Right now, the federal government functions as, Legislative and Judicial branches are reporting to the Executive. As per the constitution, all three branches are equal. The President is not above the Speaker or the Chief Justice.

The fact is, all three branches are equal and balanced.  The Chief Justice of Judicial Branch is equivalent to the Speaker of Legislative Branch and both are equivalent to The President of the Executive Branch.

Article 1 & Section 1

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

 
Article 2 & Section 1
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. 

Article 3 & Section 1
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in Supreme Court.

For many decades, the constitution has been misinterpreted and the ugly labels of D & R divided the United States.

Thank goodness! The President doesn't carry the label. Barack Obama doesn't carry the label as The President [D] of United States of America.  George W. Bush didn't carry the label as The President [R] of United States of America.

Likewise, the Supreme Court judges don't carry the label as Chief Justice [R] of the Supreme Court or Judge [D] of Supreme Court.

Then why do we have these ugly labels only for the Legislative Branch. Look at the speaker.

Paul Ryan [R-WI] Speaker of the House.

The Speaker is equivalent to the president of the executive branch. Does the speaker need those labels. R refers to Paul Ryan is a republican. WI represents Wisconsin.

As long as Paul Ryan was a representative, he represents Wisconsin. When Paul Ryan becomes the speaker of the House, then he represents the entire USA. 

Paul Ryan - Speaker of the House.

This should have been the better one. Get rid of these ugly D & R labels from the Legislative branch. Right now, because of these labels, the Legislative branch is divided into two.

Because of this division, the federal government could't function. With this division, there are four branches.

  • Legislative [D] branch
  • Legislative [R] branch
  • Executive branch
  • Judicial branch
________________________________________________________

Look at the reflex!

He sensed the danger and responded to it. This is the best test. Donald J Trump's physical and mental health are very good. He fit to be the President of the United States.

Had it been any other candidates, they would not have noticed the danger at all. The bird might have caused a lot of damage; their team members would have been in a state of shock and surprise.

These guys could not have sensed the danger of Donald J Trump to their political parties. How could they sense the danger from external forces like Islamic State.

2015 is the end of both political parties.

Does United States of America needs political parties like China or Russia?

China needs a political party. Russia needs a political party.
Even Europe needs political parties.

The Founding Fathers of United States came to this new land to build a federal government without any political parties.

The GOP is at the end of its life. In either way, it is the end. Whether you nominate Donald J Trump or not, the GOP will not survive.

When GOP nominates Donald J Trump, Jeb Bush is going to challenge by announcing his candidate as an independent.

If GOP doesn't nominate, Donald J Trump is not going retire as a loser. He will go independent.

Ben Carson & Carly Fiorina will anyway go independent. They will blame the party; quit and go independent. Carly Fiornia fought with Wolf Blitzer for not asking her way of solving the problem. 

Social Media is very effective. There are plenty of volunteers available.  If Islamic State could recruit effectively then you could also recruit for your cause. 

When these candidates tell their volunteers, that they are not going to quit in the middle; they will stay and continue the fight till the end, then the volunteers will dedicate themselves for the cause. 

It doesn't matter you win or lose in the general election; volunteers would appreciate if you are not going to be eliminated by the primary processes. 

All candidates have realized that this is their last chance. Nowadays, election doesn't come every four years. It comes once in eight years.

In 2008, DNC had a great primary election process. In 2012, nobody challenged the sitting president. In 2016, only three candidates. That was the end of Democrats party in USA.

Bernie Sanders has been the longest-serving independent Senator in U.S. Congressional history. DNC couldn't sense the danger of Bernie Sanders. How could an independent Senator conform to DNC cage. 

Donald J Trump is for Republican; Bernie Sanders is for Democrats. Both will not quit and get eliminated. 

Nomination or no-nomination, they will be candidates in the general election.

With this revolution, the broken Legislative branch will become a one whole; just like one whole Judicial branch.

In Judicial branch, all nine judges are independent. There is no permanent division. It doesn't mean they all are YES men or women. 

For case by case,  each one of them will have their own perception. Each one of the judge's judgment will be unique.

Likewise, all Senators and House of Representatives would function with total independence and freedom. Issue by issue they may express their own views and doesn't need to be the servants of the executive President.

Again, respect and honor the Constitution of United States. Stop and end the mis-interpretation. Then those guys also stop and end mis-interpreting the Islam.

Change, it starts from you. Let all candidates get equal opportunity in the general election. Let none be the victim of the traditional primary election and elimination process.
  




Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Google CEO is not qualified to become the President of USA

“Let’s not let fear defeat our values.”

Former Google CEO and current Alphabet chairman Eric Schmidt wrote an essay published in The New York Times last week calling for tech companies to create tools that will “drown out the hate with a broadly shared humanity that only the Web makes possible.”

“We need strong leaders worldwide who will fight broadly for human progress and tolerance, and focus on bettering everyone’s lives,” Schmidt wrote.

Authoritarian governments tell their citizens that censorship is necessary for stability. It’s our responsibility to demonstrate that stability and free expression go hand in hand. We should make it ever easier to see the news from another country’s point of view, and understand the global consciousness free from filter or bias.

It’s been heralded as a driver of democracy, enabling citizen uprisings and on-the-ground reporting during the Arab Spring in North Africa and the Middle East, the Umbrella Revolution in Hong Kong and protests in Brazil and India this year.


For Pichai, the fight against anti-immigrant rhetoric feels personal. Although Pichai doesn’t address his faith, he notes that he is an immigrant, having come to the United States from India 22 years ago. He sees Google’s “vibrant mix of races and cultures” as a core strength.

“We are urgently working to become much more diverse, because it’s so important to our future success,” Pichai wrote. “Let’s not let fear defeat our values. We must support Muslim and other minority communities in the U.S. and around the world.”
________________________________________________________________

First and foremost, when Google CEO Sundar Pichai made a statement on "Let's not let fear defeat our values," he didn't mention that his statement was a response to Donald J Trump's plan of total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.

That is not right. In this era, communication has to be direct. Google CEO Sundar should have said that he didn't agree with Donald J Trump suggestion.

“Let’s not let fear defeat our values."

The fact is there are no values. There are no values in democracy system of government. In democracy, it is all about numbers. Value doesn't exist in democracy. The number of votes make the candidate a winner. All character and value based candidates have no place in the platform. Bobby Jindal had to leave, because he couldn't get the numbers.

King and Queen still have value. King of Jordan is all about values.

Queen of United Kingdom is also about value. Queen got value by giving up all her rights to the citizens of United Kingdom. But the politicians brought down the value of United Kingdom and made it as a House of Cards.

When you use measurement such as, majority and minority; ranking of leadership; even position on the debate platform; it is all about numbers. Numbers do count; not values.

If values count then Rand Paul may be in the center stage; not at the edge.

Where does value exist? Does it exit in business enterprises? Does it exist in family?

We ask our children about their grades and ranking? Do we build characters in our children?

With all our actions, we do destroy the natural human character in our children.

Once upon a time, parents told stories about their national leaders and their characters; and their services to the nation building. In India, a few decades ago, parents told their children about Gandhi and other leaders. In America, a few decades ago, parents told their children about George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Abraham Lincoln.

Nowadays, parents talk about the political leaders and warn them that they don't become a scoundrel like those politicians. Where does value exist?
________________________________________________

America is a land of opportunity. 
America is a land of restrictions and limitations.

Sundar didn't realize the restrictions and limitations of United States of America.

  • Sergey Mikhaylovich Brin (Серге́й Миха́йлович Брин) is a Russian-born American.
  • Lawrence "Larry" Page is an American.
  • Eric Emerson Schmidt is an American.
  • Sundararajan Pichai (பிச்சை சுந்தரராஜன்) was born in Madras.

As far as Google is concerned, all four may be equal. They get equal opportunity to become CEO of the organization. But, outside Google, they don't get equal opportunity.

Of four, only two are eligible and are qualified to be a candidate of the Presidential election. Sundar and Sergey don't have the opportunity and both are not eligible.

As per the constitution, even Christopher Columbus could not become the President of United States.


It is ridiculous. Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger is an Austrian-American. Arnold could become a Governor of a state; but not the President of United States.

Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger should approach the Supreme Court and fight for equal rights and equal opportunity. We talk about majority and minority discrimination among Shia, Sunni and Kurd. But, right here in United States, denying an opportunity to Arnold is a discrimination.


Bobby Jindal is a qualified candidate for Presidential election. But he had to give up. Opportunity is denied to Bobby Jindal. The presidential election is only in November 2016. But Bobby had to leave in mid 2015 itself. Why?

Bobby Jindal is a victim of the traditional politics of United States. The Constitution doesn't say that you conduct a quarter-final, semi-final and then final election. The Constitution doesn't say that you need to eliminate candidate at each stage and filter them to be qualified for the last stage.

Mang good leaders had been victim of this primary elimination tradition. Conducting a primary is totally unconstitutional process.  Eliminating a candidate based on primary result is a discrimination. Denying an opportunity to be a candidate in the Presidential election is against the fundamental rights of the citizen.

Is there a problem having ten candidates in the Presidential ballot? Why only two?

Let people decide. Do people have only two choices?

Drink either Coca-Cola or Pepsi?

There will be no confusion. Let people choose their drink.

They may choose water or milk or lemonade or beer or whiskey or wine or orange juice.
Why do they have to drink either Coca-Cola or Pepsi?
Let them taste something fresh and new.


Hillary Clinton is the victim of the primary elimination tradition. Hillary Clinton should fight against this model of electing the President of United States. Instead Hillary Clinton surrenders herself to the tradition.

Had Hillary Clinton fight against the system, she may not become the President of United States. But Hillary would have got the title as, Founding Mother of Modern USA.
___________________________________________

If anyone has an ambition to contest the Presidential election, go for it. Nobody could deny you the opportunity. Nobody could eliminate you from contesting in the election.

It doesn't matter whether you win or lose, but you have fundamental rights to contest.

So, instead of wasting your time about worrying in this primary and that primary, just focus on the final election in November 2016.

Don't let others to decide for you.

Contesting or leaving - should be your decision; not others.
_______________________________________________

So, Sundar & Sergey, work with Arnold. Let Arnold file his petition in the Supreme court and let the Third Branch give a clear definition for the phrase,

We, the people

Who are, we the people refers to.
Does, we the people refer to all citizens or
does it differentiate one citizen from another citizen?

All citizens of United States pay same percentage of taxes on their income.
Then all citizens should get equal opportunity to contest any election.

Arnold, ask for equal opportunity to be a candidate in the Presidential election,
or ask for a tax break for those naturalized citizens, who do not qualify to be a candidate in the Presidential election.

"No taxation without representation"

Let the world realize the fact that United States is a land of equal opportunity to all, born citizens or naturalized citizens. 

The poor thing is, those Green Card holders - they have no voting rights here and no opportunity to vote in their mother nation. But they pay taxes.

Perhaps, Donald J Trump is right. Let us first fix our home. Then we will go around fix the world and other planets problem.


Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Trump - Carson Team for 2016

Donald J Trump & Ben Carson

They have one thing in common. They are not politicians. One is businessman; another is professional doctor. They are the real challenges to the American Political System.

Islamic State is not a threat to American politicians. American politicians are afraid of these two.

Not just the GOP is scared of these non-politicians; but also the Democrats party is worried about them. Apart from these two political parties, CNN is much more worried about these two non-politicians.

These two non-politicians are breaking the tradition. In fact, they don't do any thing against the constitution; but their actions are breaking the tradition; the tradition of two party based politics.

In fact, George Washington was totally and completely against this idea of forming political party. Had George Washington lived for one more decade then he might had suggested an amendment to prevent anyone from forming any political party.

When an immigrant comes into this country, the very first thing the person reads, is the Constitution of United States. After reading it, the very first question the person may ask,

Which party George Washington belong to? 
Was Washington a democrat or a republican?

A few decades ago, Ross Perot tried to break this tradition. But Ross Perot couldn't do it.
In those time period, politicians control the media.

Now, with Social Media, the traditional media lost its power to control the flow of news and information. Social Media empowers the people.

Social Media did bring in change in several countries. So, it could bring in change at home also.

Today's topic of discussion is about next season of House of Cards.
Look at the timings; March 14, 2016.
That is when you see the real heat of the Presidential Election.

Netflix may announce the entry of Claire Underwood as an independent candidate of the presidential election 2016. Netflix is all out to break the tradition of Washington politics.

Claire Underwood may build a new White House in Mountain View, California. Why all power need to be concentrated in Washington. Let the President work from west-coast and other two branches work from east-coast. After all, California is now part of the United States. It was not when they built the White House. Let the power be physically balanced with clear physical separation.
_________________________________________

In today, CNN show, the traditional politicians are the best; their performance was the best. In fact, they performed better than Kevin Spacey & his team.

Oh my goodness, the scene between Ted Cruz and  Marco Rubio that was the best performance. That scene is much better than any scene, where the politicians having fake arguments  in House of Cards. Ted Cruz demonstrated the master art of politics. Marco Rubio couldn't hide his fake and kept his head down.

Ted Cruz was better than Francis Underwood when he said, I will make Donald J Trump to pay for building the wall on the border.

They came prepared for this show on CNN. The traditional politicians came prepared; not for the debate; but for performing their act. Each one is assigned for a role with a script.

Jeb Bush & Rand Paul had to pull Donald J Trump down. They did an excellent job.

Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio had to create a scene that would become a topic of discussion for the people.

Somehow, Donald J Trump sensed it and questioned the moderator Hugh Hewitt.

In the last debate, the moderator asked all about running as an independent. That was a fair question and it was the best way for a moderator to be fair and just.

But, here in CNN show, Hugh Hewitt asked this question only to Donald J Trump and Ben Carson. The unfair part of a moderator to express joy and happiness in getting a commitment from these two non-politicians. Hugh Hewitt was assigned with that task and that script. He did perform well; but he couldn't hide his enthusiasm.

Debate moderator is like a judge in a court or a referee in a game. Referee is not supposed to express his joy for a goal.
_____________________________________________

Both Donald J Trump and Ben Carson do not belong to this club. Whether it is Britain or Washington or Beijing or New Delhi, politicians are all the same; same House of Cards; same, ruthless Francis Underwood.

They will eat both Both Donald J Trump and Ben Carson alive. Somehow, these two non-politicians are real people. In fact, they would better represent the real America.

Just quit; form a team of Trump-Carson; let people know:

We are not the democrats. We are not the republicans.
We are the people of United States of America.

That would be the end of GOP; end of Democratic party; end of CNN too.

For both, Both Donald J Trump and Ben Carson; it is now or never.
Quit and start a fresh journey as independents;
don't form a third or fourth political party.
Just get rid of them.

As per the Constitution of United States of America, as per George Washington wish, go independent.

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Total and Complete Shutdown for All


Shutdown of Muslims entering USA

Donald J. Trump Statement on Preventing Muslim Immigration

(New York, NY) December 7th, 2015, -- Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on. According to Pew Research, among others, there is great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim population.

Most recently, a poll from the Center for Security Policy released data showing "25% of those polled agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad" and 51% of those polled, "agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to Shariah."

Shariah authorizes such atrocities as murder against non-believers who won't convert, beheadings and more unthinkable acts that pose great harm to Americans, especially women.


Mr. Trump stated, "Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life. If I win the election for President, we are going to Make America Great Again." - Donald J. Trump

_____________________________________________________

Donald J. Trump is no longer a Republican Presidential Candidate.

As far as, We, the People concerned,
          Donald J. Trump is the President of United States of America.

This is innovation; it is disruptive innovation. It has already disrupted both political parties and challenged the tradition; the tradition of eliminating candidates with primaries like American Idol.

Donald J. Trump is uniting the Divided States of America. You may question his means; but the end is, as he says, Let us Make America Great Again.
______________________________________________________

 until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on

Donald J. Trump is very clear about his statement. It is not a permanent ban. We need this ban to understand the challenge.

In World War II, everybody understood the problem. There was Adolf Hitler. There was a political organization called Nazi. They were against Communists and Jews.

In 1940, all world leaders clearly understood the problem and then they could take effective action against Hitler. It did work.

The current challenge is, nobody could clearly describe the problem. The enemy is invisible. You cannot ignore them as non-existent. How could you destroy, if you cannot face them. So, war is not an answer and it didn't work. For two decades, we have been fighting; but the challenge keep evolving.

So, take a break and try to understand the problem. Without understanding the problem, how could you find a solution.

Donald J. Trump is right on the point.

For instance, if you know the issue is Polio or Cholesterol or Cancer or even HIV; then you can start the treatment.

But the current challenge is very complex and nobody understands it.

Donald J. Trump will be an effective Executive President. He delegates the job to the Legislative Branch. "Our country's representatives," that is the way three branches should work.

Clear division and separation of authority; responsibility and accountability.

Let the Legislative Branch work on it and give us a direction; then we will act on it. Till then, let us have a temporary ban. The Legislative Branch needs time; let us give them enough time; till then, let there be a ban.

_______________________________________________________________

a total and complete shutdown of 
Muslims entering the United States

 As such, this statement may be a controversial one. It may cause polarization. Leadership all about generalization; not any specialization. Let the statement be:

a total and complete shutdown of 
Immigrants entering the United States

People may accept it. It has a effect on so many sectors.

United States could hold jobs from going out of the country. In-sourcing and out-sourcing would come to an end. Local businesses would grow. Global menace will come to an end.

Shutdown all the international air-ports. For now, don't worry about tourism. Let the citizens of United States freely move around within USA and let them visit all states from Florida to Alaska.

For now, forget going around Europe, Asia, Middle East and Australia.
Shutdown the whole international movement of people. First let them enjoy total and complete freedom in their nation.

Give a six months period for people choose their place to live during this shutdown period. If anybody wants to go and live in Mexico, India, China, Syria; let them go; don't come back during the shutdown period.

Let us first develop relationships with our next door neighbors.

Many countries would love it. India would shutdown. Europe would shutdown.

In this technological era, communication replaces transportation. You could have a virtual meeting with people living across the world. You don't need to travel.

Every nation has a huge list of unfinished jobs. Let the nation complete those unfinished work. For instance, in India, the unfinished task is, building a temple for Rama. Let them complete it now.
_____________________________________________________
 Why people alone; extend it to goods too.

a total and complete shutdown of 
Goods entering the United States

Right now, Walmart imports bi-cycle from China.
With this new policy, No Import; No Export.
Let us Make in United States.

Again. Again is an effective word here. Once America was leading in manufacturing activities. Now, with this new policy, Let us Make America Great Again in Manufacturing.

Make and Sell in United States. That will ensure jobs for all.
So, shutdown all sea-ports; no immigration; no customs.

For now, Think Local and Act Local.
We will go to global, once all global issues would have been resolved.

India would adopt this policy immediately. There is no other go; businesses have to Make in India.

Right now, not even, movies are made in India. From now on, let them make all Tamil, Telugu and Hindi movies in India.
_______________________________________________________

Global Menace

Terrorism is not the only menace. Black economy is a very large and serious global menace. India is now facing a huge black money issue.

With the total and complete shutdown, India could effectively eliminate the black economy.

So, not only USA, all nations need this temporary shutdown.
No movement of goods or people across the borders.

It may take a year for United States to implement this new policy, invented by Donald J. Trump.

All other nations would implement it right away with huge support from their citizens.

For now, let us Think Local and Act Local.




Tuesday, December 1, 2015

First Hindu Ruler after 800 years

Mohammad Salim dares Rajnath Singh

It began when Mohammad Salim said that in the wake of BJP’s stupendous victory in the last general election Rajnath Singh had claimed that Narendra Modi will be first Hindu ruler in 800 years after the centuries old era of Prithviraj Chauhan.

Rajnath Singh was visibly angry as he got up for the second time to interrupt the CPM leader. “In my long parliamentary life I have not been hurt like this. I have never said anything like this. I know what I speak. My words are always measured. If anyone makes a statement like this he has no right to be Home minister of the country, least of all myself. I am deeply hurt.”

Rajnath Singh is bent on setting the record right, more so because he holds the high post of Home minister and is the designated Number Two in the Modi government.

A generally measured and quiet Rajnath Singh has become this upset for the second time in the last 16 months and threatened to quit if the charges against him were proved right. 

Salim clarified he was not leveling any allegation nor did he want to cast any aspersion on Rajnath Singh,  but was only quoting from the weekly. At one stage, he said have been happier if Rajnath Singh were the Prime Minister instead of Modi, drawing jeers from the treasury benches.
____________________________________________________

உன்னைச் சொல்லிக் குற்றமில்லை;
அவரைச் சொல்லிக் குற்றமில்லை;
இந்திய அரசியல் அமைப்பு அப்படி இருக்கு.

யாரு வேண்டுமானாலும்; எப்ப வேண்டுமானாலும், தேசத்தின் பிரதமராகலாம்.

Look at the timing. Narendra Modi is in Paris. Here in India, this was the headline.

Rajnath Singh said Mohammad Salim is his friend; Mohammad Salim said Rajnath Singh is his friend. Both friends had staged a wonderful drama on the floor of the parliament.

"First Hindu Ruler after 800 years."

It is a very simple statement and it may be true from the perspective of RSS. So, it is true that someone made this statement and others clapped their hands and enjoyed it.  What is wrong in it?

Rajnath Singh had overreacted to Mohammad Salim's statement. In fact, Rajnath Singh did a over-acting and got now exposed about his intention.

Rajnath Singh is the Home Minister of India. As a Home Minister, Rajnath Singh has access to all intelligence. Rajnath Singh cannot say that he had no idea about this article on the Outlook. It was a very serious article with bold statements like:

 Last fortnight, the respected Pakistani commentator Ayaz Amir wrote in The News: “Nar­­endra Modi is the best thing that could have happened to Pakistan. He is making India look like General Zia’s Pakistan.... More power to Hin­­dutva, more power to the saffron Nazism of the RSS, the spiritual fountainhead before which the Indian PM bows.”

The Home Minister of India cannot be ignorant about this article. If Rajnath Singh is ignorant then how could you delegate the responsibility of protecting the Home to Rajnath Singh.

So, Rajnath Singh knew about this article and its content. With the help of Mohammad Salim, Rajnath Singh highlighted this article to the whole world; and look at the timings; Modi was busy in Paris, building his image to counter any challenge at home. Here in India, Rajnath Singh captured the headline.

So, as per the Indian Constitution, it is all about, pulling each others leg.

மடியிலே கனம் இல்லை என்றால், எதுக்கு இத்தனை பதட்டம்.

Why should Mohammad Salim be happy, if Rajnath Singh be the Prime Minister. Was it the conspiracy of the Communist Party of India.

A few weeks ago, BJP Veterans along with Arun Shourie made a statement in revolt against Narendra Modi and Amit Shah.

At that time, Nitin Gadhari and Rajnath Singh issued statement against BJP Veterans.

நான் அடிக்கிறமாதிரி அடிக்கிறேன்; நீ அழுவதுபோல் அழு; உலகம் நம்மை வேடிக்கை பார்க்கட்டும்.

As per Narendra Modi's policy and his political strategy: Ignore; ignore it; ignore them.

But, Nitin Gadhari and Rajnath Singh tried to keep the flame alive; but it didn't work.
________________________________________________

Sangh Parivar is now like any other parivars.

In this time period, in parivar:
   there is no love;
   there is no violence;
   but, there in non-violence.

Non-violence is the cold-war within the Sangh Parivar.

At home also, there is no domestic-love; there is no domestic-violence; but there is domestic-non-violence between family members. They don't fight physically with one another; and there is no physical love also; but politics with diplomacy and hurting with words; all kinds of new evil qualities are emerging in human beings.

Next time, Rajnath Singh or Nitin Gadhari or any other; hire current movie directors from Kodambakkam. They could set the stage properly and make it so real.  Better luck next time.




Thursday, November 26, 2015

Your Hardware & Their Software

Islamic State consider Indian fighters inferior

Where ever Indians go, they are treated as second class citizens. Indian fighters are inferior; blame it on Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. It is because of Gandhi, Indians could never develop their skill on battlefield. Had Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose been leading India, all indians would have been the best fighters.

In Obama Administration, there are so many indians. But there is no indian in the US military.

Vegetarian is one of the reason for disqualification. For battle field, you need to eat beef and build your body with strong muscle. Just doing yoga and meditation will not help in the battlefield.

It is an insult to indians and to India. Secretary of State, Madame Sushma Swaraj needs to take up this matter with the high-commission of Islamic State and fight for equal opportunities in Islamic State for indian fighters.

In ancient india, they divided the society into four divisions and those divisions were based on the strength. One division was to develop the skills for the war. Somehow those four divisions got infinitely divided into small divisions and all divisions tried to become the superior one, that was brahmin. Brahmin has the only intelligence and no battlefield level skills. In modern india, all are brahmins with so much intelligence.

Once sardarjis were considered as great warrior. But look at Manmohan Singh; he has only intelligence and no skill of a warrior.

So, Secretary of State, Madame Sushma Swaraj could open up diplomatic channels with Islamic State and demand for positions in the intelligence, information technology departments of Islamic State.

As India changes its constitution and adopts the US Constitution, Sushma Swaraj may have a new title as Secretary of State instead of Foreign or External Affairs Minister. After retirement, Barack Obama could be the political consultant for India and could help India to become a strong nation like the United States of America.

Lord Krishna saved Bheema from getting killed from the hands of Dhritarashtra when all the Pandavas came to meet him after the war. Dhritarashtra insists each one of the Pandavas to hug him. When, Bheema approached Dhritarashtra, then Lord Krishna instructed him to place Bheema's iron statue that was used by Duryodayana while practicing Gadayudda, before Dhritarashtra instead of Bheema himself hugging Duryodana's father. Dhritarashtra crushed the iron statue into pieces. Thus, lord Krishna prevented Bheema from getting crushed from the hands of Dhritarashtra.

All these celebrations of the Constitution of India is not out of love for Ambedkar. It is all about making a new constitution.

Military Hardware
In Islamic State, they don't have any manufacturing facilities to manufacture civil or military vehicles. Those vehicles are all manufactured by the most developed nations. Most of the cars and vans are manufactured by Toyota. They have money to buy the military hardware from you.

So, it all starts from you. Your child observes you closely about your style of smoking a cigarette and when your child grows up, he starts smoking cigarette. You have been the model for them. They learn it from you. They learn from you to hold and operate the military hardware. They just follow you.

Soon, they will buy sophisticated military aircraft and will organize airstrikes on your cities. They could just walk into your country; buy drones; build with do-it-yourself kit; and operate with remote control on your cities. You have been guru for them.

So, they need your hardware to execute their software. Without your hardware, they couldn't even move around. Your hardware is military equipments. Their software is their religion Islam.

Hire Hackers
Security firms hire hackers to design and test their systems. Likewise, you need to hire military hackers to deal with the threat of Islamic State. You need people on the ground to cause damages in the Islamic State. You could build a mobile app for this purpose. People on the ground could download this app and operate with it.

You call them Hackers of Islamic State. They could register; cause damages to the property of Islamic State; you pay them via Western Union for the damages they caused on the ground. Using your app, they could take a before and after picture with geo-coordinates and upload into secure server. If they damage tires of a vehicle, pay them $400. If they damage the entire vehicle, pay them $1000.

Without tires and vehicles, they cannot move around. Have a strict control on vehicle tires and sale of vehicles. Without your hardware, they cannot cause large scale damages.

You need to build a self-destruction mechanism in all your military hardware. When someone steals your military hardware, they should not be able to operate them.

Stop Sales of Military Hardware
When you build a military hardware, just own it. Military hardwares are not for sale. They are not economic goods. Your country economic should not depend on the sale of military hardware. Build them and own them.

Military hardware should be your country honor and prestige; not a commercial product. They buy your AK-47 with their money and use that weapon to kill your own people.

Had you not sold them AK-47, they could not have caused so much of damage.

Leaders of Islamic State
Never eliminate the leader of a group. Let the leader live. By nature, the leader would become physically weak and weaken the organization. When you eliminate the leader, you are clearing the hierarchy and help the next one to move up in the ladder. When the leader lives, conflict slowly builds up in the top level and the organization disintegrates naturally.

In United States, if there is no limit on presidential terms, then someone from the democrats would assassinate the sitting president.

No Acronym
This is a suggestion for the leaders of Islamic State. Don't use any acronym. Let the world keep saying the word, Islam. So, call your nation as Islamic State.

Don't use the current name such as Syria, Iraq. Your goal is to build a new Islamic State which is going to replace the current name such as Syria, Iraq. So, just stay with Islamic State

Let them grow
Dinosaurs were very large animals. But the current world faces no danger from dinosaurs. So, let them grow big and will become extinct.

Even wild animals like Lion, Tiger; no threat for the world.

Mosquitos do cause damages to the society. But, more damages are caused by invisible microorganisms like bacteria and viruses.

So, let them grow big and you could handle them effectively.

If Islamic State could effectively win over Assad and other groups, then you could handle one big Islamic State rather than many small fragments of groups.

Death & Life
Death is freedom. Life is burden. So, let them live; don't kill them. They cannot carry on with war and military actions forever. They need to start with their civil responsibilities. Let them manage their government.

To build a nation or to expand a religion, they need people. If they kill all, then nobody will be there to offer prayer to their god. Without people, there will be no religion; no nation; no administration.

If they need to expand Islam, then they will no kill people. They will say, you be a Kurd or Sunni, or Shia or European or American, let us all worship Allah.

If they manage their government good, then people from Europe and America would make a pilgrimage to these land.


Sunday, November 22, 2015

Islamic State Empire


source

The 5 Most Powerful Empires in History by @AkhiPill.

The (First) Persian Empire
The Achaemenid Persian Empire was founded by Cyrus the Great around 550 B.C.E., who went by the title of King of Kings (Shahanshah). Although the Persian Empire came to an inglorious end at the hands of Alexander the Great in 330 B.C.E., it had a lasting legacy on the subsequent development of world civilizations and future empires. Indeed, the Persian Empire was a pivotal empire because it was the first true empire that set the standard of what it meant to be an empire for future ones.

The Roman Empire
The Roman Empire has long been the empire par excellence for the Western world. But its importance is not the product of Western bias: the Roman Empire was truly one of history’s greatest empires. The Romans displayed the awesome ability to conquer and hold large swathes of territory for hundreds or even thousands of years, if the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) is accounted for. But it was not held together by brute force alone; once conquered, people aspired to become Roman, which meant participating in a sophisticated, urbane, classical culture.

The Caliphate
The Arab Empire, also known as the Caliphate, was a political entity founded by the Muslim Prophet Muhammad that encompassed most of Arabia by the time of his death in 632 C.E. It is more reasonable to call this the Arab Empire rather than the Muslim Empire because while Islam originated and spread because of this empire, there were many subsequent empires that were legally Muslim or ruled by Muslims but were not Arab.

The Mongol Empire
The Mongol Empire was another empire that originated on the periphery, and against all odds, defeated enemies much more powerful and populous than it. It was the world’s largest contiguous land empire, one that struck terror into all its enemies. Founded by the Mongol warlord Temujin, who assumed the title of Genghis Khan in 1206 C.E., the Mongol Empire first grew by picking off parts of China, as many previous steppe tribes had done.

The British Empire
The British essentially made the modern world. British institutions of representative democracy inspired French Enlightenment philosophers such as Montesquieu to devise theories of modern government that influenced other modern European states. The main characteristics of the United States— a commitment to liberalism, the rule of law, civil rights, and trade— were inherited from the British and spread throughout the world. Most of these characteristics evolved organically throughout the long history of England, rather than being the result of some master plan.

So, it is human nature to establish an empire of their own. Then they proudly say, "Sun never sets in their empire."  Hitler tried to build his empire; but, failed in his attempts.

The British empire would have continued even now. In fact, Hitler suggested the British, "All you need is a single bullet to save the British empire." That single bullet was for M.K. Gandhi. That was true.

In 1945 British election, had Winston Churchill won, the British empire would have continued till now. It all took one single Prime Minister, Clement Attlee to bring down the Great Britain to an ordinary Britain.

The current Islamic State is an innovative concept. Look at the name; it is not Arab State; or Persian State; or Middle East State or Sunni State. It is Islamic State and  it will grow into an empire; Islamic State Empire.

If you look at all empires, they captured regions with military power. But, they could hold it by establishing an effective civil administration.

In fact, in India, we witnessed. Except Gandhi, most of the Indians liked the British administration. When Gandhi said, "Quit India," many didn't agree with Gandhi. The civil administration was effectively functioning in the British empire.
Look at these documents. Even companies in Silicon Valley do not have such a clear vision and plan. Very well conceived, very well documented and very well implemented.

If these Islamic State leaders start focussing on establishing an effective civil administration then nobody could stop the growth of their empire.

Before 911, many countries recognized the Taliban government in Afghanistan. In fact, Taliban government had a set of spokesperson. The world media did listen to those spokesperson of Taliban.

The entire world and the media, in this period, have unquenchable thirst for bad and the worst news. For many decades, they had been searching for news, images and movies about Hitler. Now, almost all had enough of Hitler.

If you look at the history of Rome and Vatican, there had been so many good human beings did a wonderful service to the humanity as the Pope. But, people are not interested in those high moral value leaders. People are interested in the worst Pope, Borgia. Netflix and others are interested in investing and producing the story of Borgia. Same goes true for House of Cards. Who wants to learn about George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and Winston Churchill.

So, the very first thing the Islamic State organization needs to do is to setup a team of spokesperson to give periodic interviews about their future plan, latest developments to the world media. Make sure, the team consists of both men and women, who could speak in any languages.

Once these spokespersons are available, then the whole world would listen to them. The world may push all these Republican presidential candidates to the background and would closely follow the Islamic State spokesperson in social media.

The Democracy and Freedom
The democracy system of government is a failure. Check with Barack Obama and the Prime Minister of any country. The three branches are not working at all. The Legislative branch is a total failure and it lost its purpose.

In democracy system, the time, money and resources have been spent in elections and campaign. People are tired and frustrated with politicians in the democracy system and all are looking for an alternative system of government. So, the whole world would be interested in learning about this new experiment on Islamic State government system.

The Islamic State has only the Executive branch and they are not burdened with the Legislative and Judicial branches of government. So, it is quite natural the Islamic State would be way ahead of other governments.

Paris
If the Islamic State leaders are serious and sincere in establishing their empire then they should avoid any short-term gain activities such as, the Paris incident.

As long as the Islamic State leaders engaged in conventional military actions, they will get the support of the people of the world.

Religion
People do need a religion for psychological security. Almost all religions are losing their ground. But, the Islam religion is expanding. All other religions have been diluted and lost its core values. All religions are now commercialized. Nowadays, nobody says Merry Christmas. It has been diluted to Happy Holidays. With money, people feel empowered than their god. People stop begging the god for wealth. Now, people are in a position to offer more wealth and gold to the god. All festivals have lost their meaning.  This generation may not even know the purpose, meaning and the value of any religious celebration. All they care about are the food; dresses; expensive fire-crackers and movies released on that day.

Fasting and self-torture attracts more people to the Islam religion. That is one of the main reason, people from all around the world are now attracted to the Islam. Even in highly advanced technology companies also, you could see a few persons go to a corner and do their prayers very religiously.

Modern Weapons
Even in Paris, those guys needed modern weapons like AK-47 machine guns to carry out large scale killings. If the whole world give up on all modern weapons, then we could completely avoid massacre. Could we go back to the old weapons like Sword, Bow & Arrow, then we could completely avoid any major massacre like the Paris.

The fact is, we all are addicted to modern weapons. Main part of the tax-payers money goes into weapons.  Designing and manufacturing high-precision and highly powerful weapons demand a lot of science, engineering and technology skills. You build these weapons and the Islamic State leaders get them and make the best use of them.  If you stop building weapons, then they couldn't get them.

Awards and Punishment
Whether it is home or work; whether it is kids or pets; award and punishment are the only things work. People need to be motivated with awards and disciplined with punishment.  Human lives have been completely commercialized. Awards and punishment is the system of market economy; not a system based on religion.

Almost all religion try to preach value in the system; value in human lives. Instead of punishment, Islamic State leaders could preach values and build a value based community.

Humanity includes Islamic State
The world leaders said the entire humanity should stand united to fight against terrorism. The fact is, they are part of the world humanity. It is one whole world.

The world leaders need to find the way to include the Islamic State; not to isolate them.

Mental Health
The most challenging issue of this generation is mental health. Persons who have mental health issues may commit suicide or may become a mass murderer. People may get bored with repetitive and routine life style. They need excitement. Islamic State may be an attraction for them.

Neighbor
In western countries, they don't have neighbors. Every individual life is a private life. Even in a family, husband, wife and children live alone. For husband and wife arguments, neighbors will not interfere; the family needs to go to the court.

In ancient eastern countries, the whole village used to be one big family. No strangers could enter into a village without the knowledge of the native people. They welcome anyone; but they will ask so many questions and will get the complete details of the new person.

In western countries, they all become one, only in crisis. The recent incident in Paris, united all the people of Europe and America. In other times, they don't even know their neighbors. All are strangers to them. That is an advantage for the killers. They could assemble in an apartment and plan for their attack, without the knowledge of the people living in the next door.

But in Islamic State, it is big family. Each individual could get support from many others. They all eat from a single big plate.

It is a two different world. This part of the world doesn't understand the other part of the world. That misunderstanding would develop more conflict than any resolution.

The challenge is real and very serious. Any action taken in hurry may worsen the situation.









Sunday, November 15, 2015

Chaos and Confusion in the current world.


Paris attack and loss of human lives is the reflection of the most chaotic and confused world of this time period. This is the tragedy and this is the truth. This is the state of the  current world; the most confused world.

Till a decade ago, there was a clear separation between the east and the west. The east had its own problem and its own solutions. Likewise, the west had its own problem and its own solutions. But there was a clear separation. In fact the whole world was divided into two parts as eastern part of the world and western part of the world.

In that divided world, the issues had been localized. Local issues had never grown into global issues. Local issues were easily manageable by local leaders and local dictators.

But, in this decade, the clear separation between the east and the west have vanished. The east and the west are now combined into one whole world. In this process, it is quite natural for human beings to undergo the chaotic and confused state of mind.

Diwali celebration in the west and Happy New Year celebration in the east is the current world.

The combination of the east and the west have not happened in a natural way. It has happened in a more accelerated way. People from the east started migrating into the west to learn more about science and modern management. People from the west started going around the east to learn about the spiritual science.

When the east and the west get combined then chaos and confusion is the natural outcome. That is what the current world is facing. These challenges are new and very complicated. It is very hard to understand the current challenges of the world.
 
Observation and perception would facilitate human beings to understand the current challenges. But the challenges are, human beings are overwhelmed with superficiality.

India used to maintain a very low profile in the international stage. But in the recent years, we organize a very high profile superficial show in the international stage. All these superficiality activities add more chaos and confusion in the minds of human beings.

The Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi staged his high-profile superficiality show in London. The London newspapers had headlines: persona non grata; All is forgiven Mr. Modi; blood in his hands.

This is the first time in the history; no other Prime Ministers had such headlines during their visit to foreign country.

The next day, Modi had lunch with the Queen and in the evening, it was a high-profile entertainment at Wembley. Very entertaining music and dance performances. People enjoyed the song, Australia se America, Made in India. Then Mr.Modi delivered his speech; dialogue in proper modulation and delivery. The crowd cheered for every word.

But no news in the next day newspaper. Paris attack was there in all newspapers. Nobody paid any attention to his third day activities.

People who went to Wembley now feel that they took a great risk of their life, after watching the Paris attack in the television and in the internet. They will never go to any large gathering event. They would prefer to watch the event in the television, sitting at home.

Paris attack is a tragedy; Modi show in London is a comedy. In the international stage, India is losing its reputation and respects. The Indian Prime Minister doesn't need to stage his superficial show. Let Modi entertains his friends in Sangh Parivar.

One thing we need to admit that Modi puts up effective show in the international stage. Let Modi be the Face of India; but we still need Soul of India.

BJP veterans and Sangh Parivar could meet and make the changes in the organization. Any position other than the Prime Minister, would be a downgrade for Narendra Modi. So, let Narendra Modi continue to be the Prime Minister of India.

As Modi enjoys the foreign trips, let Modi be in charge of External Affairs, Commerce and IT also.

For, the Soul of India, we need a motherly face. Perhaps Sushma Swaraj may be the Deputy Prime Minister of India. Let Sushma take care of Home, Finance and Defense.

In that way, it will all be well balanced. The BJP veterans will be happy. Sushma could handle the issues in the Parliament effectively. Sushma could talk to other Parliamentarians.

Parivar is greater than an individual. So, India needs collective leadership. It is very difficult to train Modi about the giving up the superficial nature and follow the truth. Instead, let Modi continue with his fake nature and let others handle real issues.

Amit Shah deserves a page in the history of India. Party presidents have no space in the history. So, let Amit Shah be the Chief Minister of Maharashtra. Amit Shah could build modern, developed Maharashtra.

It is now obvious, nobody pay any attention to Team India in Turkey. All other leaders have serious consultation about Paris and challenges of the world. When they relax, they may ask the Indian Prime Minister to entertain them with his stage performances.

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Revolt in BJP

This is the real challenge to the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The challenge is not from outside; it is from within. Narendra Modi can not ignore these challenges.

They are BJP veterans. They have been practicing hindutva throughout their life. Now, all of a sudden, just for Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, how could they give up their ideology.

You cannot blame them. They have been behaving as usual. They couldn't change all of a sudden, just because Modi got the power. In fact, they have been tolerant for all these years. They thought that once they got the power, then they could easily establish their hindutva in action. But no action has been taken to satisfy their needs.

They have a huge list of needs. Narendra Modi is not paying any attention to their needs. Narendra Modi has time to meet all CEO around the world; but no time to talk to their parivar members.

Their position got worse with Narendra Modi in power. When Manmohan Singh was in power, they had the freedom to express their views. But not anymore. It is quite natural that they will revolt against Narendra Modi and Amit Shah.
____________________________

Media have been using the word, tolerance and intolerance for the current crisis. Even the President Pranab Mukerjee said these words in his speech. It is totally and completely wrong.

For instance, let us take United States. Same-sex marriage is a social issue there. But they don't use the word, tolerance or intolerance. They are fighting for equal rights. Tolerance or intolerance do not apply there. It is their right; fundamental right.

In India, practicing any religion; or no religion; or no god; it is the fundamental rights of the citizen of India. There is no question of being tolerant or intolerant. When you interfere in other person fundamental rights, it is violation of law.

Even in family, husband may be fan of Dharmendra; wife may be fan of Amitabh. they don't say, one being tolerant to another.

As per the constitution, religion or no religion is the fundamental rights of the citizen. You don't need to be tolerant or intolerant towards fellow citizen. You have no rights to interfere the rights of other citizen.
___________________________________

Narendra Modi got himself into a deep mess. Narendra Modi had totally and completely changed from hidutva into vikaas. As an individual, Narendra Modi respects all religion. But that is not enough. Narendra Modi has to transform each individual in his party. That is a toughest job. It is highly impossible. They will never give up Ram or Sita, just for vikaas of India. Ram and Sita are more valuable than their own life.

You cannot play with these sensitive issues. You may not agree with them; but you could never underestimate them. It is not about their belief; it is their life; way of living. They don't believe about Rama and Krishna; they live with them.

Look at that lady, Jashodaben. Could you convince that lady with your logical arguments. Nothing works. It is the way, they live.
_______________________________________

If you want to master the art of politics, then India is the best place.

Politics in America is like a High School education.

Politics in London is like bachelors degree education.

Politics in India is like masters and Ph.D

Politics is very well experimented in India. Mohandas Karamchand did a lot of experiments in politics. His whole life was an experiment. Then, Indira Gandhi did a lot. All experiments don't need to be good ones. Then all regional leaders have experimented a lot and they master the art.

In fact, regional leaders like Jayalalitha, Mamata and others; the party members open their mouth only with the blessings of their leader.

It is now obvious that neither Narendra Modi nor Amit Shah has any control over their party members.

In Congress, the party members; even after such a massive defeat; do respect and listen to Sonia.

But in BJP, party members are all on their own.  As far as BJP concerned, Rajnath Singh was the only leader could effectively manage the party; other than Vajpayee and Advani.

Amit Shah is just micro-management. It is the usual desi-indian style. Any indian desi could easily master the art of micro-management.

Amit Shah was conveniently ignoring the veterans and trying to bring-in new faces. Naturally, these veterans will revolt. Satrughan Sinha, what was the problem in declaring as the Chief Minister candidate? Satrughan Sinha would be the MGR or NTR of Bihar.
________________________________________
Narendra Modi hired corporate marketing consultants for his election. That was a political blunder. Corporate consultants have no idea about politics in general and certainly they are ignorant of Indian politics.

In India, it is not about winning an election; it is all about managing to stay there in Delhi. In the recent years, Manmohan Singh mastered the art. Staying there for ten years is highly impossible one. But Manmohan Singh did mange to swim with those sharks without much trouble.

Cho Ramasamy is the best person for Indian politics; but Cho developed friendship with Modi and couldn't play the role of Krishna. Playing the role of Krishna is the most challenging one. Certainly, Arun Jaitley doesn't fit to play that role.
__________________________________________
Had Cho Ramasamy played the role of Krishna with greater responsibility then this how it would have gone.

MGR way is still the best way of coming out of the parent organization. Before election, in the BJP national convention, somehow make Advani as the Prime Ministerial candidate and let Modi come out of BJP in protest.

Start a new political party with Amit Shah as the head. Let the new party be, BVP.

BVP - Bharatiya Vikaas Party.

Total freedom from sangh parivar; free from strong ideology like hidutva.

Then, all those slogans would work; Abhi baar, Modi sarkar. Aachche Din.

Managing a corporation is different from managing a country with complex political burden.

It's time for a Chai pe charcha with all those BJP veterans. Modi can not ignore them any longer. Modi has to break his silence and talk to his party family members. BJP veterans have been tolerant with Modi and Shah for a long time. It's time for the veterans to revolt against Modi and Shah.


Sunday, November 1, 2015

Make in China


Look at the political system in China. It is very simple; but effective system.
The political system in China consists of:

  • The General Secretary
  • The Politburo, consisting of 22 members
  • The Politburo Standing Committee, 7 members, the most powerful decision-making body
  • Military
  • Discipline Commission - against corruption
Very simple system. For this century, this is the most effective system.

Look at the democracy. In India, we spend time and energy to conduct elections. Look at the Bihar election. It is just a state election. But the leader of the nation has to spend all his energy to campaign for Bihar election. The Prime Minister Narendra Modi is not very particular to make fellow BJP as Chief Minister of Bihar. All, Modi is interested in increase in numbers in the Rajya Sabha. Because, Arun Jaitley told Modi; we need numbers in both houses; otherwise, we cannot pass any law.

Look at United States. Donald Trump is the only candidate ready to challenge the misconception of the Constitution of United States. The Constitution clearly says, we, the people directly elect the President of United States; not through primaries and secondaries. All these party convention and party candidates are against the Constitution. Nobody has the right to deny an opportunity to contest an election. In 2008, Hillary Clinton was denied the opportunity to contest in the election. Contesting in an election is the fundamental rights of citizens of United States of America.

Just like, American Idol or any other reality show, they try to eliminate the candidates from contesting in the general election.

In China, no wastage of time, money, energy and other resources in the name of democracy.

In China, there are no branches of government; no legislative; no judicial.
One whole system, that is the executive branch only.

The system helps the leaders to make the decision fast and start implementing it right away.

Recently, they made a decision; one-child policy comes to an end.
It is so simple; but effective and powerful.

Had it been democracy, there has been discussion in the legislative branch; lower house; then upper house; at the end, with so much difficulty, the government manage to pass the law. But then in Supreme Court, the judges dismiss the law.

We give a lot of responsibilities to the Prime Minister; but no authority to execute those responsibilities; but, we do question the Prime Minister for accountability and stick a label on the Prime Minister as a weak one or an ineffective Prime Minister in the history of India.

Recently, the political leaders of China assembled in a hotel and took a major policy decision to end one-child policy. This decision would transform the entire China.

They didn't spend time to discuss with opposition and other political parties. They didn't spend their energy in designing a slogan like, Make in China.

At last, there is one nation on earth understands the philosophy of Karl Marx. When Karl Marx said, let us all share the common good; that means, let us all share the wealth. But all communist countries end up in sharing the poverty.

China has one more advantage; no god and no temples. The government doesn't need to spend its energy in managing religious groups and those conflicts.

In many ways, China model works. The seven members Politburo Standing committee is the most powerful decision-making body. But the seven members act with greater responsibility.

Of all nations, India is the most confused nation; loaded with religious and communal conflicts.

 

बस करो


Swamy tweets, “My appeal to Modi government stands: Building Ram Temple in Ayodhya must begin in 2016. If government doesn't know how then ask me or get out of my way.”

Look at this picture. It would have been better, if the camera was on the other side.

It is obvious, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi didn't hug Subramanian Swamy; not even a hand-shake; no namaste.  Modi said:

நீ எல்லாம் ஒரு ஆளு; உருப்படியாக ஏதாவது, உன் வாழ்க்கையில் செய்து இருக்கிறாயா; எவனை எப்பொழுது காலைவாரி விடலாம் என்றே, எப்பொழுதும் சிந்தனை.

வாஜ்பாய் காலை வாரிவிட்டே; இப்போ, என் காலை, எப்போ, எப்படி வாரலாம் என்று, துடியா துடிக்கிறாய்.

இராமர் வந்து உன்கிட்டே கேட்டாரா; எனக்கு கோவில் கட்டு என்று, இராமரும், சீதையும் வந்து கேட்டாங்களா.

தமிழ்நாட்டுக்கு முதலமைச்சராக போறேயா.  நீ, தமிழ்நாட்டுக்கு முதலமைச்சராக போ. அதுதான், இராமருக்கு நல்லது; எனக்கும் நல்லது; நாட்டுக்கும் நல்லது.
___________________________________
It is obvious that Manmohan Singh government was the most corrupt government in the history of India. Manmohan Singh was not directly involved in high-value corruption; but, Manmohan Singh couldn't question the coalition partners about their corrupt practices. Manmohan Singh didn't have authority to question the corrupt ministers and MPs.

Even in that situation also, people might have participated in the fight against the corruption; but nobody did return the award. People in India always enjoyed the freedom of expression. Even in the British empire, persons like Subramania Bharathiyar did enjoy total and complete freedom of expression.

But, now in Narendra Modi's period, returning the award is an insult to the government. As Arun Shourie said, people now recollects the golden period of Dr. Manmohan Singh.

Arun Shourie might have assumed that he was a life-member of BJP organization. But, now, the organization said that Arun Shourie didn't renew his party membership; so, he is no longer part of the BJP.  The good thing is, Arun Shourie is now a free-citizen of India. Free from bondage of a political organization. Free to express; free to review the performance of Government of India.

You cannot send Subramanian Swamy out of BJP, so easily. As a backup plan, Subramanian Swamy launched a new organization. The entire sangh parivar supports Subramanian Swamy.

Just like Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Subramanian Swamy also effectively uses Twitter. In fact, Swamy is more effective than Modi in Twitter.

Narendra Modi uses Twitter for continuous propaganda; but Swamy doesn't believe in propaganda; not try to please anyone; speaks truth with facts and figures; most of the time, Swamy challenges others.  

So far, Narendra Modi has been ignoring Subramanian Swamy. This is the first time, Narendra Modi expressed his frustrations to Swamy. From now on, Modi has to take Swamy very seriously.

Narendra Modi has only two options. One is, Modi having chai pe charcha with Swamy. The other option is, Modi has to face the challenges of Swamy.

The good thing about corruption is; no loss of life. Nobody dies because of corruption. In fact, there are a lot of good things about corruption. Corruption is the best indicator of economic growth. Nobody could imagine the wealth of wireless industry. Only after 2G, people did realize the potential of wealth.

That is good thing about corruption; absolutely no loss of lives. But, when you start issues like beef; Ram temple; caste and communal issues; there will be loss of lives. Leaders, who is leading those movements have to be held responsible for the loss of lives. Then the leaders may hesitate to build temple for Ram.

reincarnation.  All these so-called hindu organizations, they talk so much about sanskrit and religious philosophy. But nobody practices what they talk about. No hindu leaders could say that he or she will be the Prime Minister in his or her next life. Everybody understands the truth that there is only one life. That is the reason, they want to take this opportunity.

Opportunity is over once for all for Advani. Advani doesn't say that he would become the President of United States of Prime Minister of India in his next life.  If Swamy misses 2016, that is the end of his public life.

In 2016, India will be leading in social-media trending with issues like beef; other social and communal issues.

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose way.

source: indian newspapers

Excellent perception; very well done; wonderful expression; effective communication.
Even, Thackeray family would appreciate it.

Whatever Thackeray family do, they are not Gandhiyan way. They do not follow Satyagraha or Non-Violence or Ahimsa. They do not follow western diplomatic way too.

Whatever they do are natural desi action; this is native way.

The whole world knows India and Pakistan are दुश्मन Then, why do we need to pretend as friends.

First let us become friends and then have celebration. Why do we need to fake?

Here in Silicon Valley, California, there was a birthday party for kindergarten kids. Parents also participated. One desi offered a chair to a person. That person grabbed the chair from the desi and told, "We don't need to beg you. We know how to take it from you."

For sometime, the desi couldn't understand the context. Then the desi learnt that the other person was a pakistani and he was referring to Kashmir.

Not only, India and Pakistan, all over the world, there are rivals. Israel and Palestine. Even in business, Apple and Google. Rivals are rivals; why do we need to please the rival.

Gandhiyan way is the most confused way. Gandhi admitted that his way was a total failure.

Non-violence is not born out of love. Non-violence doesn't mean that Gandhi loved the British.

Gandhi didn't love the British. So, non-violence is just another form of violence.

We need to stop pleasing pakistanis. Both, India and Pakistan, first need to understand the conflict. And then resolve the conflict. Then love blossom naturally.

Intellectuals may not understand the reasoning of Thackeray family. But, common citizens do understand the reasoning and agree with Thackeray.

Instead of Gandhi, India could have followed Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose way.

Mohammad Ali Jinna could not have approached Netaji and demanded for partition.

Netaji could have maintained the whole British India.

As Netaji worked closely with Hitler, we would have got a Chancellor of India.
Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose would have been the first Chancellor of United India.
United India includes current Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma and Ceylon.

Only disadvantage would have been, the new India would have been part of Hitler Nazi Empire.
Instead of English, we would have been speaking in German.
German empire would have continued for another 300 years.

At the end, look at the history; everyone is a failure.
Hitler lost in war.
Churchill lost in election.
Netaji Bose lost in war.
Gandhiji lost in partition.

Someone asked the Prime Minister Clement Attlee, "so, finally the British lost to the non-violence and Satyagraha."

The Prime Minister Clement Attlee said, "no way. we used India to defeat Churchill."
In 1945, Churchill lost the election. In 1947, India got freedom. Not only India, but also many countries got freedom, because of Gandhi.

Pakistan, Bangladesh, Ceylon, Australia, Canada and so many.

The current conflict between India and Pakistan is the result of mismanagement of Gandhi, Attlee and Jina. Had Netaji, Churchill handled, this conflict would have never been created at all.

Last, but not least; Thackeray has to make one thing clear.
The current protest is all about India and Pakistan; it is not about hindu and muslim.



Celebration of National Emergency

President Pranab Mukerjee Proclaims National Emergency.

"Security of India Threatened by Internal Disturbances"

Preventive Arrests; Press Censorship Imposed.

Internet is completely shutdown.
No access to Twitter and other Social Media.

The Prime Minister Narendra Modi explains Action.

Life normal in Delhi, Chennai, Bombay, Calcutta.
___________________________________________________

Did we make any amendments in our constitution to avoid another National Emergency?

The answer is a Big No!

If Prime Minister Indira Gandhi could do it, then what prevents Prime Minister Narendra Modi from imposing a National Emergency in 2015?

Narendra Modi is in a very advantage position. There is no person like Sanjay Gandhi in Modi's family.

Then, Jayaprakash Narayanan is also dead; and now, nobody has that kind of leadership quality.

Subramaniam Swamy may follow the same route this time also; Swamy goes to Ceylon; from there to United States; seeking political asylum;  then actively tweet in favor of restoring democracy in India.
______________________________________________

“Emergency made a huge dent; it was a setback for India’s democratic tradition. But at times, goodness comes out of the bad,” Modi said.

“The J.P. movement, the anti-corruption movement, the fight against Emergency after 25 years of Independence was an occasion… Today, the people in political life in India, most of them, are those who were born out of the Emergency,” he said.

Modi said that J.P. had the capacity to get some positivity out of the Emergency.

“Emergency should be remembered not to brood over what happened then, but to strengthen our resolve to fortify and further strengthen the democratic values and framework in our country,” he said.

The prime minister said Indian democracy became stronger after the Emergency.

“I don’t want to cry about Emergency. We must remember Emergency and recognize the power of democracy… make future generations aware of it. It is the demand of the times,” he said.
_______________________________________________

Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid the foundation for the next National Emergency.

Modi doesn't have any special love for JP or Advani or Swamy. Modi didn't even sit there for the entire event. No cabinet ministers participated.

Modi had asked Venkaiyaji to plant the seed. Venkaji thanked Indira Gandhi for bringing him into public life; otherwise, he would have been a lawyer.

Then, Modi went on talking about all those good things, great actions, excitement of emergency.

This is the first time, someone gave a positive-spin on emergency. Modi would have thanked Indira Gandhi for having the courage to conduct this experiment at the national level.

We did learn our lesson from National Emergency. This time, we will avoid those mistakes. This time, we would effectively implement the National Emergency.
___________________________________________________________

In fact, in 1975, people of India did welcome Indira Gandhi's action. That was the first time, anyone could do any business transaction without corruption. Offices were opened in time; government was effectively functioning.

People didn't care about all these political leaders going to Jail.

Things started going against to Indira, because of Sanjay Gandhi and compulsory Family Planning action.
______________________________________________________

Clean India; television promotion; nothing helps.

When you charge a fine of Rupees 500 for dropping any garbage on the street, then India would be the cleanest. That is the only thing works.

Freedom demands a lot of responsibility from citizens. When citizen doesn't feel responsible, then they don't deserve freedom.

Prime Minister said: make future generations aware of National Emergency. How could you make the future generations to learn about National Emergency?

Any amount of descriptions of Biriyani would not help. Let them taste the Biriyani; then they would understand it and appreciate it.
________________________________________________________

Only the Founding Fathers of United States of America could build a wonderful constitution.  In US Constitution, three branches are part of the whole government.

All three parts are very well balanced. No one part could become a whole!

But, in India, the Prime Minister Indira Gandhi could shutdown the Legislative and Judicial.

All these leaders, born out of Emergency didn't pay any attention to fix the defect. They were busy in becoming a cabinet minister and comfortably forgot the root cause.

When you didn't fix the cause, it may grow and become a monster.
_________________________________________________________
The Prime Minister Narendra Modi has very well done his homework.

In Delhi,  Najeeb Jung will take the full control.

VK Singh. Not a politician; an effective executive; had an attempt to coup.
VK Singh would manage the military.

Other IAS executives are there to run the government.
______________________________________________________
United States would be busy with their Presidential election. They will ignore India.
Then, who else would make any strong comment against Indian government.

Only Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi follows: the means must justify the ends.

For highly ambitious Narendra Modi, the ends justify any means.

Let us continue with the experiment of democracy.