Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose way.

source: indian newspapers

Excellent perception; very well done; wonderful expression; effective communication.
Even, Thackeray family would appreciate it.

Whatever Thackeray family do, they are not Gandhiyan way. They do not follow Satyagraha or Non-Violence or Ahimsa. They do not follow western diplomatic way too.

Whatever they do are natural desi action; this is native way.

The whole world knows India and Pakistan are दुश्मन Then, why do we need to pretend as friends.

First let us become friends and then have celebration. Why do we need to fake?

Here in Silicon Valley, California, there was a birthday party for kindergarten kids. Parents also participated. One desi offered a chair to a person. That person grabbed the chair from the desi and told, "We don't need to beg you. We know how to take it from you."

For sometime, the desi couldn't understand the context. Then the desi learnt that the other person was a pakistani and he was referring to Kashmir.

Not only, India and Pakistan, all over the world, there are rivals. Israel and Palestine. Even in business, Apple and Google. Rivals are rivals; why do we need to please the rival.

Gandhiyan way is the most confused way. Gandhi admitted that his way was a total failure.

Non-violence is not born out of love. Non-violence doesn't mean that Gandhi loved the British.

Gandhi didn't love the British. So, non-violence is just another form of violence.

We need to stop pleasing pakistanis. Both, India and Pakistan, first need to understand the conflict. And then resolve the conflict. Then love blossom naturally.

Intellectuals may not understand the reasoning of Thackeray family. But, common citizens do understand the reasoning and agree with Thackeray.

Instead of Gandhi, India could have followed Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose way.

Mohammad Ali Jinna could not have approached Netaji and demanded for partition.

Netaji could have maintained the whole British India.

As Netaji worked closely with Hitler, we would have got a Chancellor of India.
Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose would have been the first Chancellor of United India.
United India includes current Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma and Ceylon.

Only disadvantage would have been, the new India would have been part of Hitler Nazi Empire.
Instead of English, we would have been speaking in German.
German empire would have continued for another 300 years.

At the end, look at the history; everyone is a failure.
Hitler lost in war.
Churchill lost in election.
Netaji Bose lost in war.
Gandhiji lost in partition.

Someone asked the Prime Minister Clement Attlee, "so, finally the British lost to the non-violence and Satyagraha."

The Prime Minister Clement Attlee said, "no way. we used India to defeat Churchill."
In 1945, Churchill lost the election. In 1947, India got freedom. Not only India, but also many countries got freedom, because of Gandhi.

Pakistan, Bangladesh, Ceylon, Australia, Canada and so many.

The current conflict between India and Pakistan is the result of mismanagement of Gandhi, Attlee and Jina. Had Netaji, Churchill handled, this conflict would have never been created at all.

Last, but not least; Thackeray has to make one thing clear.
The current protest is all about India and Pakistan; it is not about hindu and muslim.

Celebration of National Emergency

President Pranab Mukerjee Proclaims National Emergency.

"Security of India Threatened by Internal Disturbances"

Preventive Arrests; Press Censorship Imposed.

Internet is completely shutdown.
No access to Twitter and other Social Media.

The Prime Minister Narendra Modi explains Action.

Life normal in Delhi, Chennai, Bombay, Calcutta.
___________________________________________________

Did we make any amendments in our constitution to avoid another National Emergency?

The answer is a Big No!

If Prime Minister Indira Gandhi could do it, then what prevents Prime Minister Narendra Modi from imposing a National Emergency in 2015?

Narendra Modi is in a very advantage position. There is no person like Sanjay Gandhi in Modi's family.

Then, Jayaprakash Narayanan is also dead; and now, nobody has that kind of leadership quality.

Subramaniam Swamy may follow the same route this time also; Swamy goes to Ceylon; from there to United States; seeking political asylum;  then actively tweet in favor of restoring democracy in India.
______________________________________________

“Emergency made a huge dent; it was a setback for India’s democratic tradition. But at times, goodness comes out of the bad,” Modi said.

“The J.P. movement, the anti-corruption movement, the fight against Emergency after 25 years of Independence was an occasion… Today, the people in political life in India, most of them, are those who were born out of the Emergency,” he said.

Modi said that J.P. had the capacity to get some positivity out of the Emergency.

“Emergency should be remembered not to brood over what happened then, but to strengthen our resolve to fortify and further strengthen the democratic values and framework in our country,” he said.

The prime minister said Indian democracy became stronger after the Emergency.

“I don’t want to cry about Emergency. We must remember Emergency and recognize the power of democracy… make future generations aware of it. It is the demand of the times,” he said.
_______________________________________________

Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid the foundation for the next National Emergency.

Modi doesn't have any special love for JP or Advani or Swamy. Modi didn't even sit there for the entire event. No cabinet ministers participated.

Modi had asked Venkaiyaji to plant the seed. Venkaji thanked Indira Gandhi for bringing him into public life; otherwise, he would have been a lawyer.

Then, Modi went on talking about all those good things, great actions, excitement of emergency.

This is the first time, someone gave a positive-spin on emergency. Modi would have thanked Indira Gandhi for having the courage to conduct this experiment at the national level.

We did learn our lesson from National Emergency. This time, we will avoid those mistakes. This time, we would effectively implement the National Emergency.
___________________________________________________________

In fact, in 1975, people of India did welcome Indira Gandhi's action. That was the first time, anyone could do any business transaction without corruption. Offices were opened in time; government was effectively functioning.

People didn't care about all these political leaders going to Jail.

Things started going against to Indira, because of Sanjay Gandhi and compulsory Family Planning action.
______________________________________________________

Clean India; television promotion; nothing helps.

When you charge a fine of Rupees 500 for dropping any garbage on the street, then India would be the cleanest. That is the only thing works.

Freedom demands a lot of responsibility from citizens. When citizen doesn't feel responsible, then they don't deserve freedom.

Prime Minister said: make future generations aware of National Emergency. How could you make the future generations to learn about National Emergency?

Any amount of descriptions of Biriyani would not help. Let them taste the Biriyani; then they would understand it and appreciate it.
________________________________________________________

Only the Founding Fathers of United States of America could build a wonderful constitution.  In US Constitution, three branches are part of the whole government.

All three parts are very well balanced. No one part could become a whole!

But, in India, the Prime Minister Indira Gandhi could shutdown the Legislative and Judicial.

All these leaders, born out of Emergency didn't pay any attention to fix the defect. They were busy in becoming a cabinet minister and comfortably forgot the root cause.

When you didn't fix the cause, it may grow and become a monster.
_________________________________________________________
The Prime Minister Narendra Modi has very well done his homework.

In Delhi,  Najeeb Jung will take the full control.

VK Singh. Not a politician; an effective executive; had an attempt to coup.
VK Singh would manage the military.

Other IAS executives are there to run the government.
______________________________________________________
United States would be busy with their Presidential election. They will ignore India.
Then, who else would make any strong comment against Indian government.

Only Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi follows: the means must justify the ends.

For highly ambitious Narendra Modi, the ends justify any means.

Let us continue with the experiment of democracy.

Ugly Truth of Gujarat

Narendra Modi urges Gujarat calm after Patel caste protests

Gujarat's main city, Ahmedabad, is virtually shut down, and the army and paramilitary soldiers have been deployed there and in Surat, BBC Hindi's Ankur Jain reports.

Internet services on mobile phones have been suspended. Schools and businesses are closed and public transport cancelled in Ahmedabad and other parts of the state.

Among those killed in the violence were a father and son, our correspondent reports. About 40 police stations have been set ablaze.
_____________________________________

This is the truth of Gujarat. This is the ugly truth of the so called 'Developed Gujarat'. The images that have been built for ten years have been collapsed in ten days. This is the failure of Narendra Modi's Gujarat Model. This is the failure of Vikaas model of Gujarat.

To sustain any propaganda, you need to continuously keep doing it. The moment you stop, people would start learning the truth.

In fact, Hardik Patel recently said that they will expose well-propagated myth about Gujarat model. Two Gujaratis, both Hardik Patel and Lalit Modi would expose a lot of secrets and expose many failures of Gujarat model.

Whatever Narendra Modi built in Gujarat was just a cosmetic changes. The underlying base; the foundation is full of conflicts, chaos and confusion. Narendra Modi refused to pay attention to those basic problems and went on building skyscrapers on that shaky foundation. Naturally, it would collapse.

During this recent Gujarat patel protest, the internet services were suspended. Then what is the point in making big noise about Digital India and Mobile Governance.

When you engage in propaganda for your survival, then you need to keep doing it continuously. All political leaders do engage in propaganda during election; then they stop it completely.

But, Narendra Modi continuously engage in propaganda; in various form; in various medium.  Continuous propaganda would become an addiction. If you don't tweet every hour, you may start feeling that you are losing your followers. So, to hold them, you need to tweet about something on hourly basis.

That is the challenge of this century. Nobody is loyal to any organization. No one feels that he is a follower of someone. Everybody feels that he or she has the leadership qualities. At work, around ten engineers may be reporting to a manager. That manager starts quoting from George Washington to Bhagwad Gita. Everyone has become preacher and nobody is there to listen.

If Gujarat model is a failure; then Narendra Modi's model of India also will be a failure.

The Prime Minister Narendra Modi just scratches the surface; never understands the chaos, conflicts and confusion of India. Modi refuses to understand them.

Modi assumes that once we build Digital India and other economic development then all these native problems would vanish in thin air.

It is like; a person is seriously ill. We need to take that person to an hospital; understand the cause and start the treatment. Once that person recovers completely, then we shall take that person to gym and beauty parlor.

In Narendra Modi's view; there is no need to treat that person in a hospital. Once we apply fair-and-lovely, then the entire world would like India.

Could someone in BJP or RSS help Narendra Modi to understand this basic concept.  This is ignorance. With his loud mouth, Modi let the whole world know this.

Instead of talking about Narendra Modi, let us see other leaders of India. Let it be Rabindranath Tagore or Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi or Mohammad Ali Jinna. They did learn about the west. But they did understand the value of the east. In fact, they had a whole perception of the east and the west.

The current India is in a state of बीमारी . It is not Digital India; it is बीमारी India.

India needs a doctor to cure her disease; not an eloquent speaker.

Challenge the Constitution

Aditya Thackeray Defends Sena Boycott of Pak Singer Ghulam Ali

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis had said, "It is wrong to involve Ghulam Ali in Indo-Pak politics.

"What the Sena is doing with Ghulam Ali is absolutely wrong. People like him must be kept above and beyond borders," BJP Union Minister Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi had added.

________________________________________________

It is so pathetic. We spent a lot of money to conduct election. People stand in line and cast their vote. The election commission conducts the election and declare the list of Representatives of people. Then, those MLAs elect a person as Chief Minister of a state. The Chief Minister assumes that he/she has the total and complete authority. But this incident demonstrates, who has the real authority.

Thackeray family has the authority. You may call it as constitutional or unconstitutional; but they do have the authority.

Just like in movies, Sholay Kabbar Singh or Raghuvaran in Basha:
இங்க, நான் வைச்சதுதான் சட்டம்.
நாந்தான் நீதிபதி.
நான் சொல்றதுதான் தீர்ப்பு.

இதுக்கு, ஒரு அரசியல் அமைப்பு.

We need to thank all these challengers. They do test and validate the Constitution of India. Just like in software, you have QA team, they do Quality Assurance of the system and bring out the defects in the system.

This current action is not an insult to the Constitution; it is a challenge to the Constitution.

It is a clear warning to the people of India; if you would like to organize anything in Mumbai, you better get No-Objection from Thakaray family.

This is Jungle Raj. It is not happening in any remote village. It is right here in Bombay, the financial capital of India.

Recently, Narendra Modi had dinner with Financial giants in NewYork city. Now, AIG and other financial institutions would think twice to invest in India.

Instead of engaging in this kind of direct attack, they could have handled in a very cunning way; that may be called as diplomatic way.

Thakaray family could have asked some unknown person to file a petition in Bombay High Court and could have got a stay order against the event.

___________________________________
This is worse than corruption. People got angry with corrupted politicians; not because of any moral quality. People are angry, because they didn't get their share.

Manmohan Singh couldn't question his political alliance partners about their high-value corruption. Now, Narendra Modi couldn't question his Sangh Parivar.

Prime Minister of any country; same situation; and helpless.
__________________________________________

The Prime Minister couldn't ask his MPs and MLAs and party members to stop the hate speech. But, the Prime Minister asks the people to ignore them; ignore even his speech, if it has hatred.

How could anyone ignore those speech. People do ignore the President of India speech. Even the media don't take Pranab's speech very seriously.

The President of India is not an equivalent to the President of United States.

Pranab was not elected by people. Pranab was appointed by Sonia. That too, not for his past performance. Pranab got the position for loyalty.

If you're loyal, you will get a Governor post or the President post.

Nowadays, speech of any leader is just an entertainment for people. People don't take their parents or teacher words seriously.

People take only their manager's word seriously; otherwise the manager would fire them.

It's a new world; challenges are new. You cannot go on with this very old Constitution.

The Constitution of India is not just 70 decades old. Because, it is not an original. It is an adapted version of the British system. The British don't have a Constitution.

So, the Constitution of India is 800 plus years old. It's time to just put it in a museum.

Hey Ram!

The very first word of an official announcement was: The assassin was a Hindu.

As soon as the news was out, everybody thought that a muslim killed Gandhi. But, Gandhi was killed by a Hindu. The whole world was shocked when they learnt the fact that he was killed by a Hindu.

The world was under the impression that Gandhi was a leader for hindu people and Jinna was the leader of Muslim people. So they expected that Gandhi would be killed by a muslim and Jinna would be killed by a hindu.

But the truth was different from all those expectations.

Muslim people might have considered Gandhi as their enemy. Hindu people considered Jinna as their enemy. The fact is, enemy is a known threat and you could be prepared for that kind of threat.

But, nobody could take betrayal easy.

Godse, Apte and their friends felt that this was appeasing Pakistani Muslims at the expense of Hindus in India. This decision of Gandhi and Nehru had also caused Patel to submit his resignation.  

• Godse felt that the sad situation and suffering caused during and due to the partition could have been avoided if the Indian government had lodged strong protests against the treatment meted out to the Minorities (Hindus and Sikhs) in Pakistan. However, being "under the thumb of Gandhi" they resorted to more feeble ways. He also felt that Gandhi had not protested against these atrocities being suffered in Pakistan and instead resorted to fasts. In his court deposition, Godse said, "I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred ... if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces."

• In Godse's own words during his final deposition in the court during the trial, '"...it was not so much the Gandhian Ahimsa teachings that were opposed to by me and my group, but Gandhiji, while advocating his views, always showed or evinced a bias for Muslims, prejudicial and detrimental to the Hindu Community and its interests. I have fully described my Point of view hereafter in detail and have quoted numerous instances, which unmistakably establish how Gandhiji became responsible for a number of calamities which the Hindu Community had to suffer and undergo"

Narendra Modi cannot change his color when he became the Prime Minister of India. If he changes, then that is a betrayal. 

Narendra Modi cannot ignore the RSS platform. 

Narendra Modi cannot comfortably disown them.

In fact, instead of spending his time with Google and Facebook CEO, Narendra Modi has to spend quality time with his old friends; they don't call themselves as friends or comrades; they are family; parivar; Sangh Parivar.

Talk to them and take them along with you; take them along with you in your journey; that is life.

Yes. they will be burden; drag you; and pull you down. But, you cannot leave them. You need to take them along with you.

That is what every human being do; whether wife or husband, they do carry the burden of their family and try to move forward. They don't just disown the family and engage in vikaas or development; development of materials; development of dollars. 

You cannot conveniently ignore them. Then they will get upset. Then there will be a Nathuram; and will be an assassination. 

The fact is, in this century, there will be no political assassination. Because all are fake. 

In those days, Gandhi was real and had a strong policy. Likewise, Nathuram Godse also was real and had a very strong policy. So, there was a policy clash and resulted in killing.

Nowadays, all are in a state of confusion; all are fake; there are no human beings with real sense of perception.  

In politics, we don't call the leader as CEO of India. We don't expect any CEO to make a statement on current affairs of the nation. But political leaders have to express their voice; otherwise, people would consider them as dead person.

That is the difference between life and death. People do talk about Gandhi, Bose, Kalam. They don't have physical presence, but they got a life.

Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Jaswant Singh - they are still living in this world.  If Vajpayee is in good health, Vajpayee would review your performance almost everyday and would have been very critical on you. 

Somehow, Vajpayee wins the heart of all people; not just Sangh Parivar. Vajpayee never tried to change his color. In power or not in power, Vajpayee has always been part of Sangh Parivar. 

That is the problem with this kind of organization. A communist live as a communist and die as a communist. Same goes true for other organizations too. 

Ignoring Sangh Parivar is a huge and costly mistake of Narendra Modi.

in-laws of America

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Silicon Valley tour ends with rousing reception, protests

Recently, one of Obama's secretaries was making a statement about India. That secretary was an Indian-American. One senator assumed that the speaker represented India and expressed his concern on an issue with India. Then the speaker clarified that she was an American citizen; part of Obama Administration; shared the same concern with Indian government.

This is the challenge as well as an opportunity of this decade. They all look like citizen of India. But the truth is they are PIO; Persons of Indian Origin. They are not OCI; Overseas Citizen of India.

At SAP center, Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked them to come back to India.  It clearly shows his ignorance.

Last decade, they were sons and daughters of India. This decade, they are all citizens of United States of America. They renounced, abandoned their Indian citizenship. You did charge them good fees for their renouncement.

ஒரு காலத்தில், எல்லா குடும்பங்களிலும் குறைந்தபட்சம் ஐந்து அல்லது ஆறு குழந்தைகள் இருப்பார்கள். அதில், ஆண் குழந்தைகள் இருப்பார்கள்; பெண் குழந்தைகளும் இருப்பார்கள். ஆக, அந்த காலகட்டத்தில்,  எல்லா வீடுகளில் இருந்தும், பெண் பிள்ளைகள், பொறந்த வீட்டைத் துறந்துவிட்டு,  புகுந்த வீடுகளில் குடிபுகுவார்கள்.

அதுபோல், இன்றைய காலகட்டத்தில், இந்தியர்கள், தங்களது தாய் நாட்டை துறந்து, அமெரிக்காவில் குடிபுகுந்து விட்டார்கள். இந்தியா, தாய் வீடு; அமெரிக்கா, புகுந்த வீடு.

அவர்கள், தாய் நாடு திரும்ப போவதில்லை. அவர்களது, குடும்பத்து குழந்தைகள், அமெரிக்க குழந்தைகளாகத்தான் வளர்க்கின்றார்கள்.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi doesn't understand this simple truth. Modi was not addressing to Indians; they are all Americans. They don't have voting rights in India. No way, they go back to India. Their family members, their children - would say, "No Way!, going to India."

All these Indian-American are in a state of confusion. Legally, they are American citizens; but emotionally, they are still attached to India.

Indian-American citizens, they enjoy all the fruits of this country; but they will not join in the military. Had there been a mandatory military service, they would not have applied for citizenship.

When they take oath, even the house-wife says it loud that she will carry gun to defend America. She may not understand the meaning of that oath; கூட்டத்தோடு கோவிந்தா; அதனைத் தொடர்ந்து, வீட்டிலே விருந்து; வடை, பாயசத்தோடு.

When these American children visit India, they may not like to eat mutton. தாத்தா பாட்டிக்கு ஒரே பெருமை. அமெரிக்காவில் வளர்ந்தாலும், நமது இந்திய கலாசாரத்தில் வளர்ந்திருக்காங்களே; இப்படி கவுச்சி சாப்பிடதா பிள்ளையை, இந்தியாவிலே பார்க்கவே முடியாது. ஆக, பருப்பு, சாம்பார், ரசம், தயிர் தானா!

மகனோ, மகளோ, மெல்ல, தயக்கத்தோடு; சொல்லலாமா, வேண்டாமா; எப்படி எடுத்துக்குவாங்க.

அவனுக்கு, ஆட்டுக்கறி பிடிக்காது. மாடுன்னா வெளுத்துக் கட்டுவான். அதுவும் அவனுக்கு பிடித்தது:

sirloin; the most expensive part of beef; then steak; then baby back rib.

தாத்தா பாட்டி, பேரக்குழந்தைகளை ஒதுக்கி வைத்து விடுவதில்லை. அதெல்லாம், இந்தியாவில் எங்கே கிடைக்குது என்று தேடி அலைந்து, குழந்தைகள் விரும்பியதை, எவ்வளவு காசு ஆனாலும், வாங்கிக் கொடுத்து, ஆனந்தம் அடைவார்கள்.

Ashvamedha

பழங்கதைகளை எடுத்துரைத்து, தங்கள் மனதினை தேற்றிக்கொள்வார்கள். உலகமே, குழப்ப நிலையில் இருக்கின்றது.

So, these Indian-Americans are not going to come back. Not only them, even Sri Lankans will never go back to Jaffna.

So far, there have been no classification such as; Hindu-American, Muslim-American, Jew-American, Christian-American. Thanks to the Founding Fathers of America; especially Benjamin Franklin.

So, Modi is in a state of confusion. What is this new practice of hugging people? Modi hugs Nancy Pelosi. Is it what Modi learnt in RSS?

Why does Modi not hug Arun Jaitley, Rajnath Singh, Sushma?

Desis in America introduce new practices to American. When they come home, they remove their shoes. Men stop hand-shake and hugging women; instead they wish them with folded hands.

Narendra Modi acts like a teen-ager; confused between ancient-east and modern-west culture.

Vivekananda, when Swamy addressed the gatherings as Brothers and Sisters; those were not just words. That was his inner feeling.

Current experiment with Modi, is a good one. India has to go through this. So that, all of us could learn a lesson from this experiment.

Modi, The Fake

Fake: to conceal the defects of or make appear more attractive, interesting, valuable.

On Friday afternoon, at 2:45, the secretary of CEO sent out an email to all employees, with a message that at 3:00, there would be all-hands meeting in the kitchen area. At 3:00, all were assembled in the kitchen. The CEO came and went direct into the topic. The CEO said, "I have a bad news to deliver. I need to tell you right now, before it becomes a rumor. We lost one of major customer. Their business contract ends by December 2016. We will continue to offer them the best of our service. They have decided to leave us and they are going to build their own platform for their business."

All employees felt bad in losing a valuable customer; but then, they appreciated their CEO in telling them the bad news with great responsibility. That is leadership. 

When a company gets a new customer, VP Marketing makes the announcement with lot of celebration. When a company loses a customer, it is the responsibility of CEO to talk to their employees. 

Winston Churchill said, "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat." That was the first time, people got hope in their leadership. Churchill commented to his General, "Poor people, poor people. They trust me, and I can give them nothing but disaster for quite a long time."

Does anybody trust Modi? All these corporate CEOs watching Modi as magic show. They don't trust Modi and his words.

Bill Gates said: High energy of Modi has created high expectations.

Bill Gates didn't say that Modi could convert all these expectations into results and would deliver them. No body trust Modi.

Mark enjoys eating beef.  Not only Mark, all CEO enjoy eating beef, pork, fish, crab.

Just for this one reason, Make in India would end-up as a mere slogan.

China would say; in China, we don't have a democratic government. In China, nobody understands about freedom. Even the Alibaba CEO said, nothing is private in China.

But, in China, you are free to eat anything you like. No questions asked. You may call that as freedom. So, come and enjoy the freedom of eating your delicious food. Enjoy our food; then let us talk about business.

In those so called largest democracy, people have no freedom. But, in China, you have full freedom to eat food of your choice.

How do you define Fake?

கண் இருந்தும் குருடனாக; காது இருந்தும் செவிடனாக; வாய் இருந்தும் ஊமையாக.

A person is healthy and has no defects. When a person acts like a blind person; not paying attention to the truth; true incidents, that person is a fake. When a person acts like a deaf person; not listening to the truth, that person is a fake. When a person acts like a dumb; not speaking the truth, that person is a fake.

Nobody trusts a fake.

Nobody trusts Modi. His cabinet ministers don't trust Modi. BJP party leaders don't trust Modi. Sangh Parivar don't trust Modi.

In his personal life also, Modi is single. Modi doesn't have any friends.

With two incidents in his life; Jashodaben and Advani; now, everybody understands Modi's style and character. Writing Jashodaben's name in the election form is a political blunder. Who made that suggestion?

When Modi was not emotionally prepared to live with Jashodaben, he should never mention that name as his wife. That is an action against truth. It is a question for legal debate; had Modi not mentioned Jashodaben's name, would Election Commission disqualify Modi? The truth is Jashodaben is not wife of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The Election Commission could now disqualify Narendra Modi for making a false statement.

Narendra Modi might have thought, once people accepts Modi as their leader, he could conveniently disown Sangh Parivar; just like disowning his wife and disowning his mentor.

Sangh Parivar will not let Modi to disown them. People are not ready to accept Modi as the leader of India.

Fake means, to conceal the defects of or make appear more attractive, interesting, valuable. 

Huge political defects is, the constitution of India. And other social defects like caste, religion etc.

Modi tries to conceal these defects and tries to make appear India more attractive.

Just like in Australia; it could happen in India too. Not only in India, it could happen any Westminster based system. Former Australian Prime Minister was popular among people; but not with their party members. The party elected new Prime Minister.

In Westminster system, the Prime Minister doesn't have stability for five years.  The truth is, the Prime Minister is just an other Member of Parliament.

The best thing Modi could have done; right before the election; he could have disowned the Sangh Parivar. 

Annadurai did it; MGR did it. Walked out of the parent organization. That walking-out action gives you total and complete freedom. Then you build your empire.

Jiddu Krishnamurti did it. Krishnamurti disowned his parent organization. That is the first step. 

All these overseas CEO, with Asian-Indian face, they disowned their mother country. They are all Americans; have no voting rights in India. 

Now, it is Sangh Parivar vs Modi. 

Sangh Parivar knows Modi. Modi knows Sangh Parivar.

Mark, Sundar and so many CEO may have excited about Modi speech. But the next day, when they see the news about beef, they would have switched their priorities.

Next time, they will tell Modi; first fix your Sangh Parivar problems; then we shall talk about business.

Narendra Modi has to deal with the current issues first; Modi cannot conceal political defects and social defects.

So, it is not Make in India; it is not Digital India; it is Fake India.