by·stand·er a person who is present at an event or incident but does not take part.
________________________________________________________________
Talking about his government which was formed after BJP's landslide victory, the Prime Minister said "different and tough yardsticks" are being applied to gauge its performance.
"We are judged by different and tough yardsticks. I don't know why it is happening. Only time will tell. But we should accept this challenge. It is good for us that we are judged by stringent yardstick. We will pass the test," Modi said.
_______________________________________________________________
War at Kurukshetra.
That is the right way for conducting any war. We need to suggest Kurkshetra model to the world. If anyone wants to have a war with their enemies, follow the Kuruksheta model.
This may be the best strategy for the current conflict in Gaza.
Let United Nations choose a common place for a war. Let Israel sends their military over there. Let Palestine sends their military over there. Fix a date and time. Let the war happen over there. In that way, you could avoid civilian causalities.
The problem is, we don't understand the value of our culture and its meaning. How could we preach them to others. Over a period of time, it lost its true value and it has been mis-interpreted Now it is completely polluted.
So, Narendra Modi felt it; others may not even understand the true meaning of his speech.
Kurukshetra is one field; and all were there in that one field.
Krishna was also present there in Kurukshetra. But, Krishna didn't take part in action directly. Krishna's presence and his observation; that was the action of Krishna. Yes. Krishna's yardstick is of very high standard.
______________________________________________________________
Peter Drucker never had a business; Drucker never been a CEO. Drucker was a bystander.
In fact, Peter Drucker didn't teach any management technique or any tricks. Drucker tried to teach the value of human resources and the power of innovation.
The very first book, Drucker wrote was, "The End of Economic Men."
Yes. Drucker didn't start a company; had not been part of any large organization; or part of any government. But Peter Drucker was present in all those places.
______________________________________________________________
Cho Ramasamy is a bystander. Cho Ramasamy is not a member of any political party; not a minister. Cho Ramasamy was a MP; but then also Cho performed with total freedom.
Cho Ramasamy's standards are of very high standards.
So, it is nothing new.
High standards of integrity of character; zero tolerance on corruption; expectation of excellent and effective performance; has always been there.
_______________________________________________________
Karamchand used to judge his own character and his service.
In those days, they had not been familiar with all these current days management jargons.
Management by objective; roadmap; performance measurement; vertical growth; horizontal; and so on.
The only word, Mohandas knew was; truth. Mohandas never said, let non-violence movement expand across horizontally and let Jawaharlal Nehru reach the vertical position of Prime Minister.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi might quote from Bhagwad Gita; or on his own.
Ishwar Allah Tero Nam,
Sabako Sanmati De Bhagawan
Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram
Patita Pavan Sitaram.
That should be the core message from the leader of a nation to its people.
Narendra Modi has been so conditioned; Narendra Modi could never say:
Ishwar Allah Tero Nam.
Narendra Modi is not against Muslims; in fact, Narendra Modi is comfortable with Najeeb Jung.
But, religiously has been conditioned.
To highlight the difference, Cho Ramasamy is not conditioned.
In fact, Cho Ramasamy runs his business in the name of a muslim king, Mohammad Bin Thuglak.
The song in one of his movie; Allah, Allah was so popular.
Cho Ramasamy will not hesitate to say; Ishwar Allah Tero Nam.
Politically, Sushma Swaraj has an advantage over Narendra Modi.
Sushma Swaraj will have no reservation in singing the whole song of Rajaram.
Back in southern states, we had no idea about partition.
We had never gone through that part; we could never understand that part of history.
Thanks to the British; they didn't divide the Ancient India vertically.
So, it is easy for us to say anything.
Ordinary person; or even a MLA; or MP; or Chief Minister could function with a conditioned mind.
The Chief Executive of largest democracy, should be able to function without any conditions.
Outsiders may not have any idea about UP states; may not be aware of Akhilesh; may have no knowledge about various caste systems in India.
Right now, they see India as Narendra Modi's nation.
So, all these communal riots; sexual violence is the direct reflection on Narendra Modi as the leader of India. The buck stops at Narendra Modi.
Atal Bihari Vajpayee is a free man without any conditions.
It is very difficult to transform a man with external agents; transformation has to happen internally on its own. It does happen, when you keep your senses open and perceive.
Last; but not least. government has been judged by very high standards; it has been going on for more than a decade. That is what, Lal Kishan Advani and Sushma Swaraj has been trying to tell you. Today, you are there; because of those high standards had been applied on Manmohan Singh government.
You're there; because of their failure to meet those high standards;
not because of Facebook and Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment