Sunday, January 24, 2016

Political Parties in USA are Fake


America is a two party based democracy is a misconception. It is not true.

Political parties in USA are fake. To understand the truth, we need to look into countries with real political party system.

China has a very strong single political party system. It is a true political party; not like fake Democrats and Republican in USA.

People at very young age join in the political party in China as a grass-root level member. Then they spend their time and energy in the local party office. They involved in all kinds of activities like pasting a poster on the wall; organizing protest; march; fast; procession and all activities directed from the head party office. They worship their leader as god. Maa, Lenin, Stanley, Karl Marx are not just names. They are gods. Many party workers name their child after their leaders.

Look at the current head of China, Li Keqlang. Li rose through the ranks through his involvement in the Communist Youth League. From 1998 to 2004, Li served as the Governor of Henan and the province's party secretary. From 2004 to 2007 he served as the Party Secretary of Liaoning, the top political office in the province. From 2008 to 2013, Li served as the first-ranked Vice-Premier under then-Premier Web Jiabao, overseeing a broad portfolio which included economic development, price controls, finance, climate change, and macroeconomic management.

Look at Putin. While at university Putin had to join the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and remained a member until the party was dissolved in December 1991.

Look at India. At age eight, Modi discovered the RSS, and began attending its local training sessions. As leader of the ABVP, the student wing of the RSS, Modi was forced to go underground in Gujarat and frequently traveled in disguise to avoid arrest. He became involved in printing pamphlets opposing the government, sending them to Delhi and organizing demonstrations. He was assigned by the RSS to the BJP in 1985. In 1988, Modi was elected organizing secretary of the party's Gujarat unit, marking his entrance into electoral politics. He rose within the party, helping organize L.K.Advani Ayodhya Rath Yatra in 1990 and Murli Manohar Joshi 1991–92 Ekta Yatra (Journey for Unity). As party secretary, Modi's electoral strategy was considered central to BJP victory in the 1995 state assembly elections. In November of that year Modi was elected BJP national secretary and transferred to New Delhi, where he assumed responsibility for party activities in Haryana and Himachal Pradesh. Modi, on the selection committee for the 1998 Assembly elections in Gujarat, favored supporters of BJP leader Keshubhai Patel over those supporting Vaghela to end factional division in the party. His strategy was credited as key to the BJP winning an overall majority in the 1998 elections, and Modi was promoted to BJP general secretary (organization) in May of that year. Then as Gujarat state Chief Minister and then the Prime Minister of India.

Those are real political parties. People need to join young and sacrifice their life for the political organization. On recognizing their sacrifice, the party rewarded them with positions in the party and then in the government.

Nothing of that sort exists in United States. Donald Trump could be a presidential candidate only in United States. No billionaires in China, Russia or India could become a candidate even for a Mayor position.

In all countries, they managed to keep the political arena as a dirty one. Yes, politics is dirty and it is for dirty people. You better stay away from politics.  Earlier they used to keep as an arena for violence. Only with muscle power, you could enter into politics.

Nowadays, they gave up violence and muscle power. Now, the political arena is full of corruption. So, politicians let others know that politics is full of corruption; so stay away from it.

So, all politicians feel safe and secure in a political organization. They build the image of their political party and discourage citizens from becoming a challenger to their career.

In China, if a citizen would like to take part in politics the first thing the person needs to do is to join the Communist Party of China. Without the party support, nobody could become a mayor or premier in China.

Even in United Kingdom, without party support nobody could become the Prime Minister.

Only in United States, the democracy is [by, of, for] the people. All other places on planet earth, it is government [by, of, for] political parties.

So, in United States, democracy is [by, of, for] Republicans and Democrats - it is a misconception.

This misconception is coming to an end now. Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders and Social Media are the main reason for the collapse of the two party based democracy in United States.

In China, India, Russia or even United Kingdom, the candidate cannot ask for donations. In United States, all candidates asking for direct donation for their campaign. In other places, all donations go to the political party and the party distributes the fund for the campaign.

In China, India, Russia or even United Kingdom, the candidate cannot ask for volunteers help. They could take help from their party grass-root level workers. And later those workers take bribe for any job done in the government.

In United States, Obama took help from volunteers and after the election, Obama closed down all the grass-root level offices. Those volunteers could not interfere in any government business.

So, political party organizations are fake in United States. Noway, they are like those organizations in other countries.

In United States, no political organization could stop Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders. In fact, 2016 election in United States will be first of its kind in human history.

All candidates are now working to get their name listed in the ballot sheet in all states. It is not about winning or losing. It is about establishing the rights to participate in the presidential election.

All candidates are now working to build their grass-root level workers. All candidates ask for donation from the public.

All candidates enjoy total and complete freedom from CNN & FOX and very active in Social media. All their volunteers come up with innovation. It is a people movement.

In the Republican side, all candidates are happy with Donald Trump. They will continue to stay by blaming on Donald Trump. Had Donald Trump not been there, they would have had to face the same old pattern of elimination. With primaries, Ted Cruz would get nominated and all others had to endorse Ted Cruz.

Now, Donald Trump will get the nomination and Ted Cruz will concede and endorse Donald Trump. All others would revolt against the nomination of Donald Trump.

On the Democrats side, in 2008, it was a bad, ugly battle between Hillary and Obama. The volunteers came to a point to hate each others. Till the end, Hillary volunteers felt that she was not going to give up and may challenge as an independent. So, Hillary volunteers were frustrated and they are not working for her in 2016. They just stay away from the campaign.

Obama volunteers, even today, not supporting Hillary. They support anybody other than Hillary.

This would have been a win-win for all. In 2008, Hillary as the President and Obama as Vice-President. In 2016, Obama as a President. Barack Obama could have spent 16 years in the White House. Now it is a early retirement for Barack Obama.

One term for one family should be the next amendment in the constitution. So, no more White House for Clinton or Bush family.

Bloomberg is getting encouragement from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

In March, Claire Underwood would announce her candidate for presidential election. Why does she need to have the last name. So it will be, Claire Underwood for President.

With social media, a person without any money power, without any muscle power could become the executive President of United States. That is the vision, objective and strategy of Silicon Valley.
 

Saturday, January 16, 2016

No Candidate Left Behind

Ditch Debate
  • Coca-Cola & Pepsi
  • CNN & FOX News
  • Republican & Democrats
Over a period of time, somehow a pattern has emerged. Do people need to continue with the same old pattern. Conforming to the tradition and continue with the same old elimination process is unconstitutional. 


It takes courage to breakaway from the pattern. That is freedom. So many great leaders had been victim of these kind of elimination process. Rand Paul is the first person in American history did challenge the fixed pattern. Challenging the tradition is also an innovation.

Other candidates should have protested against having secondary debate by these media. They may also have to face the same kind of situation in future.

In future, as the President of United States of America, they are expected to execute high value policy like, No Child Left Behind. They couldn't raise their voice against this discrimination. How could people expect them to deliver high moral value policy?

If the candidates couldn't see the discrimination of fellow candidates, then how could they see the discrimination in the society. They could raise their voice only if they understand the sufferings of other human beings.

If they couldn't raise their voice in favor of No Candidate Left Behind, in future, how could they raise their voice in favor of No Child Left Behind.

All candidates are eligible for equal opportunity. If equal opportunity is denied to fellow candidates, as a President, how could they manage the entire nation and make sure all citizens get equal opportunity.

Rand Paul was asking viewers at one point to "turn your TV off if you're bored with that other debate and turn on your computer. Get some real answers to some real questions."

This is the way to go! Twitter and Periscope are the future platform. Direct interaction between citizens and the candidates. No fancy debate moderator and panel. The TV panel usually ask the same, repetitive, boring questions. Most of the time, others interrupt and we never get an answer from the candidate.

Here in Periscope, We The People directly interact with their future Executive President. No middle men. Over a period of time, CNN and FOX gained political party color. FOX is for Republican and CNN is for Democrats. Here in Twitter and Periscope, no political color. They provide  platform for political leadership from all around the world; not just US.

In future, many candidates may follow Rand Paul's new innovative way of direct interaction with We The People.

If you take a look at the summary of recent debate, you may find only one issue they talked about - Ted Cruz was born in Canada; so he may not be eligible for the election of the President of USA. This issue serves as an entertainment for the people; it is not an issue that is going to change the lives of the citizen of USA.

In this time period, people are smarter than those television moderators and panel of political experts. People would like to ask direct question to the candidate and also would like to listen to the candidate directly without any interruption and any interpretation by the middle persons.

Twitter & Periscope disrupts CNN & FOX.
Rand Paul disrupts and challenges the GOP.
It's time to give up all those old tradition and those fixed patterns.
It's time to innovate; innovation in politics.