Defense for Shiv Sena.

Defense for Shiv Sena. Why not?

Only Shiv Sena has a clear policy for defense. Tit for Tat. Defense is all about Tit for Tat.
Tit for Tat is equivalent retaliation. It's highly effective strategy.

This tiger picture would give Mahinda Rajapakse sleepless nights.

Here is a snippet from Indian news media:

So, Sushma Swaraj is both the external affairs and overseas Indian affairs minister; Arun Jaitley took charge of both finance and corporate affairs and he also has defence till the next cabinet expansion; Nitin Gadkari is responsible for road transport and highways as well as shipping; Piyush Goyal is minister of state with independent charge for power, coal, and new and renewable energy. In UPA, there were separate ministers for many of these portfolios.

In UPA, they did it right. Separate ministers for power; coal; renewable energy.

UPA knew that merging all these into one single energy portfolio would be good and effective.
But, politically, that is not a good decision.
UPA could survive for ten years, only because, they could satisfy many MPs with small minister portfolios.

In Indian Parliament system, the general view is - MP or a Parliamentarian is a loser.
Cabinet Minister; or at least a Minister of State - is a winner.

We need to value our Parliamentarian.
We need to make our 500 Parliamentarians to understand the fact that, they make the policy.

Policy Making is not the responsibility of any minister.
Policy Making is the responsibility of the Parliament.

Right now, why do they have discussion over Article 370 in media.
That is an insult to the Parliament.

Without first introducing it in the Parliament, ministers, Omar and RSS cannot carryon with their debate in television and social media. It is an insult to the Parliament; insult to 500 Parliamentarians; insult to the 813 million people of India.

Only Parliament has the authority and responsibility over any policy.

So, UPA used to give minister posts to those Parliamentarian and take away their authority of Making Policy.

So, BJP has to make more ministers.
Otherwise, BJP cannot face the Parliament.

It doesn't matter, whether it is BJP government or NDA government.
MPs are each individual, starving for minister posts.

Single party or Allies...every Parliamentarian has his own mouth and stomach.

ஒரு தாய் பிள்ளைகளாக இருந்தாலும், வாயும், வயிறு வேறு.

Whether it is single party or allies or any front, each MP has his or her own needs.

No minister for any Parliamentarian - that is achievable only in Modi Sarkar.

Now, it is BJP Sarkar. So all BJP Parliamentarians are big or small ministers.

So, it is obviously not, Modi Sarkar;
it is not NDA Sarkar;
it is not BJP Sarkar;
it is UPA - II Sarkar.

Regional BJP units are allies. So, there will be continuos expansion of cabinet. All NDA Parliamentarian would become a minister in these five years at least for six months period.

So, if Murli Manohar Joshi feels that he is too old for Defense, then let Shiv Sena have it.

At least UPA had an advantage.
When a Tamilnadu Congress MP asked for a minister post, Sonia could just blame DMK for taking away all the share for Tamilnadu.

Now, BJP don't have that advantage.

BJP has to create more ministers and satisfy all regions.