Silence is Suicide

Manmohan Singh was silent on corruption. Manmohan Singh was not directly involved in corruption. But Manmohan Singh couldn't stop the corruption; couldn't take any action against corruption.

In Manmohan Singh case, that silence was a suicide.

Corruption doesn't always refer to financial sense; corruption in mind cause more damage in human beings than the financial corruption.

Narendra Modi is facing this situation. Right now, nobody could effectively oppose his policy and efforts. No opposition. But, Narendra Modi is facing challenges from within.

Cancer is not from outside; cancer is from within.

Just like Manmohan Singh, Narendra Modi also maintains silence about corruption in mind of the Indian public.

Just like Manmohan Singh case, it will be suicide for Narendra Modi government.

Manmohan Singh couldn't act directly or indirectly against the corruption in finance.

But, Narendra Modi tries all kinds of indirect ways. It is not going to work.

Deal it directly. The Prime Minister has to break the silence and talk to the people directly.

Whatever Pranab & Obama said, Narendra Modi has to say directly to the people.

It demands courage; courage, even to sacrifice the power and position.

As a Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi could get his strength directly from the people. With that strength, Narendra Modi could fight against the challenges from within his parent organization.

The first step for evolving like America is, adopt their constitution.

Obama stands in Congress and confidently says that as the President of United States, he will veto those bills that are against the interest of the American public.

As the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi has no special constitutional rights to allow or veto anything. In India, the PM is just an other Member of Parliament.

Always, outside person has unlimited authority over the Prime Minister. Earlier Sonia had; now, Mohan Bhagwat has.

Three hundred years ago, the founding fathers of United States of America built the platform. We need to build that platform now in India. We could have Barack Obama as a consultant for reviewing Indian Constitution 2.0

If Narendra Modi could have constitutional authority like Barack Obama, then there will be no need for any diplomacy with any other organizations.

Known is the burden; Freedom from the known is the total freedom.

Narendra Modi has only two options. One option is Gandhi way.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi doesn't need any constitutional authority; he has moral authority.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi could unite people with his moral way;

Eshwar, Allah tera naam.

So, Narendra Modi could adopt Gandhi way.

The other option is, constitutional authority for Narendra Modi.
With the current majority, adopt new Constitution.

There is no way out. Everything else would bring Narendra Modi back to square one.

Pranab and Obama's speech could not save Narendra Modi from his current challenges. In fact, it would cause more trouble.

Narendra Modi needs to break his silence and speak about religious freedom.

Fail to do so; then silence would be a suicide for Narendra Modi's government.

Uphold religious freedom, Obama urges India

 India will succeed as long as it is not splintered along religious lines, U.S. President Barack Obama said here on Tuesday while addressing an audience of students and other invitees at the end of his visit to India. 

His words, along with a pointed reference to Article 25 of the Indian Constitution which guarantees religious freedom, is seen as a strong statement against fundamentalism and extremism here and in the U.S. 

“Every person has the right to practise their faith as they choose, or no faith at all without fear or discrimination,” said Mr. Obama.

Religion cannot be made cause of conflict: Pranab

The Indian Constitution is the holy book of democracy. It is a lodestar for the socio-economic transformation of an India whose civilization has celebrated pluralism, advocated tolerance and promoted goodwill between diverse communities. These values, however, need to be preserved with utmost care and vigilance. The freedom inherent in democracy sometimes generates an unhappy by-product when political discourse becomes a competition in hysteria that is abhorrent to our traditional ethos. The violence of the tongue cuts and wounds people's hearts. Religion, said Gandhiji, is a force for unity; we cannot make it a cause of conflict.

Much is said about India's soft power. But the most powerful example of India's soft power, in an international environment where so many countries are sinking into the morass of theocratic violence, lies in our definition of the relationship between faith and polity. We have always reposed our trust in faith-equality where every faith is equal before the law and every culture blends into another to create a positive dynamic. Wisdom of India teaches us: unity is strength, dominance is weakness. 

Narendra Modi's quiet, firm diplomacy with Mohan Bhagwat

Narendra Modi's first key message is that he will engage with the Sangh only through its top leader, Bhagwat, and not with various other notables. This is a significant break from the practice during Atal Bihari Vajpayee's prime ministership. Vajpayee would meet many second-rung Sangh leaders, for example Madan Dass Devi, and give them a hearing. Often, middle-level Sangh leaders would act as mediators.

In contrast, Modi telling Bhagwat that he will deal only with the RSS' top boss is an indication, a senior BJP leader said, of the PM's firm intention to run his government his own way.

The second message the PM communicated to the RSS chief is that it is the Sangh's responsibility to make sure that the first BJP majority government in New Delhi can work in an atmosphere conducive to delivering its development and growth promises.