Unconstitutional Authority

• Authority
• Responsibility
• Accountability

Even before independence also, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi assumed responsibility to lead the nation for freedom. People of India gave total and complete authority to Mohandas. Karamchand, on his own, used to hold him accountable for all his actions. Gandhi didn't need a constitution to discipline himself. The Sun, doesn't need a constitution for its daily performance.

After independence, Jawaharlal Nehru was the Constitutional Authority. But, Nehru, as well as Sardar Vallabhai Patel; used to consult with Gandhi. Had Gandhi lived for few more years, Gandhi's action would have been a challenge to Nehru and his government; it would have been unconstitutional.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi would have asked Nehru to get rid of the military; as a preacher of non-violence. Nehru would have had a tough time with Gandhi.

Jawaharlal Nehru as a Prime Minister had the constitutional responsibility to take the nation forward. But, Gandhi had the unconstitutional authority.

Yes. Sonia Gandhi had unconstitutional authority over Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had the responsibility to take the nation forward; but didn't have authority. Then, for good performance, as well as non-performance, Manmohan Singh was accountable.

You cannot blame anybody. It is a defect in the Constitution of India.

We need to understand this defect and fix it.

Without fixing it, India cannot move forward; it will continue to go in a circle.

Like that bull, in oil extraction plant; goes round and round.

All these unconstitutional authorities are not only burden to the Prime Minister; but also for the democracy.

People of India had reservations only for Sonia Gandhi becoming a constitutional Prime Minister.

In the current situation, the RSS Chief, Mohan Bhagwat is the citizen of India; there will be no opposition to Mohan Bhagwat to become the constitutional head of the nation.

Let Mohan Bhagwat become the Prime Minister of India; accept the constitutional responsibility of taking the nation forward; enjoy the total and complete constitutional authority; then be accountable for the people of India. That is the right thing to do.

As a Prime Minister, Mohan Bhagwat could declare all citizens of India as Hindus. Do it in the right way; do it in the parliament.

All other actions are unconstitutional.

All these unconstitutional authorities would shut the mouth of the Prime Minister. Then the Prime Minister maintains his silence for the next ten years. Once quit, then the Prime Minister would publish a book; why he couldn't function as an effective Prime Minister.

That is what Manmohan Singh did.

That is what Narendra Modi could do.

Cabinet made a decision to let Genetically Modified agriculture products. But, Mohan Bhagwat said no. Logically, that may a good decision; but it is unconstitutional.

Only Parliamentarians have the constitutional authority to approve or deny.

The fact is; Narendra Modi has total and complete freedom to think; but, as far as action, Narendra Modi has to execute the order of Mohan Bhagwat.

So, the change is, Narendra Modi is in the place of Manmohan Singh.

Mohan Bhagwat is in the place of Sonia.

Authority without responsibility is corruption. Corruption continues in India.

This is the same situation in almost all countries.

Except United States of America, all countries have unconstitutional authority.

It is worse than global warming.